ArticlePLoS computational biology2015
Orientation selectivity in inhibition-dominated networks of spiking neurons: effect of single neuron properties and network dynamics.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of Light Isoflurane Anesthesia on Organization of Direction and Orientation Selectivity in the Superficial Layer of the Mouse Superior Colliculus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022Article
- What is the dynamical regime of cerebral cortex?Neuron · 2021Review
- Spatial clustering of orientation preference in primary visual cortex of the large rodent agouti.iScience · 2021Article
- Dynamics of a Large-Scale Spiking Neural Network with Quadratic Integrate-and-Fire Neurons.Neural plasticity · 2021Article
- Theory of neuronal perturbome in cortical networks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
- Propagation of orientation selectivity in a spiking network model of layered primary visual cortex.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
- Mechanisms underlying contrast-dependent orientation selectivity in mouse V1.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018Article
- Interpretation of correlated neural variability from models of feed-forward and recurrent circuits.PLoS computational biology · 2018Article
- Fundamental Activity Constraints Lead to Specific Interpretations of the Connectome.PLoS computational biology · 2017Article
- Integration of Continuous-Time Dynamics in a Spiking Neural Network Simulator.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2017Article
- Canonical computations of cerebral cortex.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2016Review
- Emergence of Functional Specificity in Balanced Networks with Synaptic Plasticity.PLoS computational biology · 2015Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The neuronal mechanisms underlying the emergence of orientation selectivity in the primary visual cortex of mammals are still elusive. In rodents, visual neurons show highly selective responses to oriented stimuli, but neighboring neurons do not necessarily have similar preferences. Instead of a smooth map, one observes a salt-and-pepper organization of orientation selectivity. Modeling studies have recently confirmed that balanced random networks are indeed capable of amplifying weakly tuned inputs and generating highly selective output responses, even in absence of feature-selective recurrent connectivity. Here we seek to elucidate the neuronal mechanisms underlying this phenomenon by resorting to networks of integrate-and-fire neurons, which are amenable to analytic treatment. Specifically, in networks of perfect integrate-and-fire neurons, we observe that highly selective and contrast invariant output responses emerge, very similar to networks of leaky integrate-and-fire neurons. We then demonstrate that a theory based on mean firing rates and the detailed network topology predicts the output responses, and explains the mechanisms underlying the suppression of the common-mode, amplification of modulation, and contrast invariance. Increasing inhibition dominance in our networks makes the rectifying nonlinearity more prominent, which in turn adds some distortions to the otherwise essentially linear prediction. An extension of the linear theory can account for all the distortions, enabling us to compute the exact shape of every individual tuning curve in our networks. We show that this simple form of nonlinearity adds two important properties to orientation selectivity in the network, namely sharpening of tuning curves and extra suppression of the modulation. The theory can be further extended to account for the nonlinearity of the leaky model by replacing the rectifier by the appropriate smooth input-output transfer function. These results are robust and do not depend on the state of network dynamics, and hold equally well for mean-driven and fluctuation-driven regimes of activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.