Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25569338›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2015

Intranasal vaccination with leishmanial antigens protects golden hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus) against Leishmania (Viannia) Braziliensis infection.

Luzinei da Silva-Couto, Raquel Peralva Ribeiro-Romão, Andrea Franco Saavedra, Beatriz Lilian da Silva Costa Souza, Otacílio Cruz Moreira, Adriano Gomes-Silva, Bartira Rossi-Bergmann, Alda Maria Da-Cruz, Eduardo Fonseca Pinto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Cutaneous Leishmaniasis: Update on Vaccine Development.Human parasitic diseases (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Luzinei da Silva-CoutoLaboratório Interdisciplinar de Pesquisas Médicas - Instituto Oswaldo Cruz - FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Raquel Peralva Ribeiro-RomãoLaboratório Interdisciplinar de Pesquisas Médicas - Instituto Oswaldo Cruz - FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Andrea Franco SaavedraLaboratório Interdisciplinar de Pesquisas Médicas - Instituto Oswaldo Cruz - FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Beatriz Lilian da Silva Costa SouzaLaboratório de Imunofarmacologia - Instituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho, UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Otacílio Cruz MoreiraLaboratório de Biologia Molecular e Doenças Endêmicas - Instituto Oswaldo Cruz - FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Adriano Gomes-SilvaLaboratório Interdisciplinar de Pesquisas Médicas - Instituto Oswaldo Cruz - FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Bartira Rossi-BergmannLaboratório de Imunofarmacologia - Instituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho, UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Alda Maria Da-CruzLaboratório Interdisciplinar de Pesquisas Médicas - Instituto Oswaldo Cruz - FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Eduardo Fonseca PintoLaboratório Interdisciplinar de Pesquisas Médicas - Instituto Oswaldo Cruz - FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious results have shown that oral and intranasal administration of particulate Leishmania (Leishmania) amazonensis antigens (LaAg) partially protects mice against L. amazonensis infection. However, vaccination studies on species of the subgenus Viannia, the main causative agent of cutaneous and mucosal leishmaniasis in the Americas, have been hampered by the lack of easy-to-handle bio-models that accurately mimic the human disease. Recently, we demonstrated that the golden hamster is an appropriate model for studying the immunopathogenesis of cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by L. (Viannia) braziliensis. Using the golden hamster model, our current study investigated whether the protective effect of intranasal immunisation with LaAg can be extended to L. braziliensis infection. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsGolden hamsters vaccinated with either two intranasal (IN) doses of LaAg (10 µg) or two intramuscular doses of LaAg (20 µg) were challenged 2 weeks post-vaccination with L. braziliensis. The results showed that IN immunisation with LaAg significantly reduced lesion growth and parasitic load as well as serum IgG and IgG2 levels. At the experimental endpoint on day 114 post-infection, IN-immunised hamsters that were considered protected expressed IFN-γ and IL10 mRNA levels that returned to uninfected skin levels. In contrast to the nasal route, intramuscular (IM) immunisation failed to provide protection. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: These results demonstrate for the first time that the nasal route of immunisation can induce cross protection against L. braziliensis infection.

Indexed as

Administration, IntranasalAnimalsAntibodies, ProtozoanAntigens, ProtozoanCricetinaeImmunoglobulin GInterferon-gammaLeishmania braziliensisLeishmaniasis, CutaneousLeishmaniasis VaccinesParasite LoadSkinAntibodies, ProtozoanAntigens, ProtozoanImmunoglobulin GInterferon-gammaLeishmaniasis Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID25569338
PMCPMC4287559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.