ArticlePLoS genetics2015
Elevated mutation rate during meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification of a master regulator Msd1 that governs meiotic entry in a global basidiomycete pathogen.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Break-induced replication forms long mutable single-strand DNA during meiosis.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Adaptive Spo11 RNA editing gate optimizes meiosis I pace and mitotic proliferation while preserving ascospore formation.Science advances · 2026Article
- Why recombination hotspots?PLoS genetics · 2026Review
- Meiotic double-strand DNA breaks and spontaneous mutation in Drosophila melanogaster.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Roles of Mutation, Ploidy, and Recombination in Adaptive Evolution in Two Divergent Model Yeasts.Genes · 2026Review
- Elevated mutation near crossovers inhibits the evolution of recombination.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Meiotic DNA breaks drive multifaceted mutagenesis in the human germ line.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Article
- Homologous Recombination and Repair Functions Required for Mutagenicity during Yeast Meiosis.Genes · 2023Article
- Detection of Primary DNA Lesions by Transient Changes in Mating Behavior in YeastInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Practical Approaches for the YeastInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Article
- Chromosome-dependent aneuploid formation in Spo11-less meiosis.Genes to cells : devoted to molecular & cellular mechanisms · 2023Article
- The megabase-scale crossover landscape is largely independent of sequence divergence.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Natural and artificial sources of genetic variation used in crop breeding: A baseline comparator for genome editing.Frontiers in genome editing · 2022Review
- Distinct requirements for the COMPASS core subunits Set1, Swd1, and Swd3 during meiosis in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2021Article
- Loss of heterozygosity results in rapid but variable genome homogenization across yeast genetic backgrounds.eLife · 2021Article
- Meiosis-Based Laboratory Evolution of the Thermal Tolerance inFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Article
- From molecules to populations: appreciating and estimating recombination rate variation.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Mutations accumulate during all stages of growth, but only germ line mutations contribute to evolution. While meiosis contributes to evolution by reassortment of parental alleles, we show here that the process itself is inherently mutagenic. We have previously shown that the DNA synthesis associated with repair of a double-strand break is about 1000-fold less accurate than S-phase synthesis. Since the process of meiosis involves many programmed DSBs, we reasoned that this repair might also be mutagenic. Indeed, in the early 1960's Magni and Von Borstel observed elevated reversion of recessive alleles during meiosis, and found that the revertants were more likely to be associated with a crossover than non-revertants, a process that they called "the meiotic effect." Here we use a forward mutation reporter (CAN1 HIS3) placed at either a meiotic recombination coldspot or hotspot near the MAT locus on Chromosome III. We find that the increased mutation rate at CAN1 (6 to 21 -fold) correlates with the underlying recombination rate at the locus. Importantly, we show that the elevated mutation rate is fully dependent upon Spo11, the protein that introduces the meiosis specific DSBs. To examine associated recombination we selected for random spores with or without a mutation in CAN1. We find that the mutations isolated this way show an increased association with recombination (crossovers, loss of crossover interference and/or increased gene conversion tracts). Polζ appears to contribute about half of the mutations induced during meiosis, but is not the only source of mutations for the meiotic effect. We see no difference in either the spectrum or distribution of mutations between mitosis and meiosis. The correlation of hotspots with elevated mutagenesis provides a mechanism for organisms to control evolution rates in a gene specific manner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.