Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25569113›Full record

ReviewCell adhesion & migration2015

Tenascin-C: Exploitation and collateral damage in cancer management.

Caroline Spenlé, Falk Saupe, Kim Midwood, Hélène Burckel, Georges Noel, Gertraud Orend

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell adhesion & migration, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Advancing Cancer-Targeted Nanotherapies with Tumor Homing Peptides.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Advances on the roles of tenascin-C in cancer.Journal of cell science · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Caroline Spenléa Inserm U1109, MN3T; Université de Strasbourg; Strasbourg, France; LabEx Medalis; Université de Strasbourg; Strasbourg, France. Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg (FMTS) ; Strasbourg , France.
Falk Saupe
Kim Midwood
Hélène Burckel
Georges Noel
Gertraud Orend

Funding

Versus Arthritis 20003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite an increasing knowledge about the causes of cancer, this disease is difficult to cure and still causes far too high a death rate. Based on advances in our understanding of disease pathogenesis, novel treatment concepts, including targeting the tumor microenvironment, have been developed and are being combined with established treatment regimens such as surgical removal and radiotherapy. Yet it is obvious that we need additional strategies to prevent tumor relapse and metastasis. Given its exceptional high expression in most cancers with low abundance in normal tissues, tenascin-C appears an ideal candidate for tumor treatment. Here, we will summarize the current applications of targeting tenascin-C as a treatment for different tumors, and highlight the potential of this therapeutic approach.

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyAnimalsExtracellular MatrixHumansNeoplasmsRNA InterferenceTenascinTumor MicroenvironmentTenascincancerextracellular matrixtenascin-Ctumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID25569113
PMCPMC4422814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.