Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25568919›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2014

Hypermutation in human cancer genomes: footprints and mechanisms.

Steven A Roberts, Dmitry A Gordenin

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 258 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
258citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
15.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

258 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 414 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. HAMMER: Hairpin-based APOBEC3A-mediated mRNA editing reporter.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Journal of virology · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

198 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Steven A Roberts
Dmitry A Gordenin
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences · US

Funding

Environmentally-modulated cytosine deamination in genome instability and cancerR00ES022633 · NIEHS · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ROBERTS, STEVEN A · 2015 to 2017
$868k
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 ES999999NIEHS NIH HHS K99ES022633‑01NIEHS NIH HHS R00 ES022633
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A role for somatic mutations in carcinogenesis is well accepted, but the degree to which mutation rates influence cancer initiation and development is under continuous debate. Recently accumulated genomic data have revealed that thousands of tumour samples are riddled by hypermutation, broadening support for the idea that many cancers acquire a mutator phenotype. This major expansion of cancer mutation data sets has provided unprecedented statistical power for the analysis of mutation spectra, which has confirmed several classical sources of mutation in cancer, highlighted new prominent mutation sources (such as apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme catalytic polypeptide-like (APOBEC) enzymes) and empowered the search for cancer drivers. The confluence of cancer mutation genomics and mechanistic insight provides great promise for understanding the basic development of cancer through mutations.

Indexed as

MutationDNA DamageDNA RepairGene DosageGenome, HumanHumansNeoplasms

Identifiers

PMID25568919
PMCPMC4280484
OpenAlexW2044563319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.