Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25568122›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2015

Motor origin of precise synaptic inputs onto forebrain neurons driving a skilled behavior.

Daniela Vallentin, Michael A Long

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A feedforward inhibitory premotor circuit for auditory-vocal interactions in zebra finches.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Corticobasal ganglia projecting neurons are required for juvenile vocal learning but not for adult vocal plasticity in songbirds.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Building a state space for song learning.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2018
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniela VallentinNYU Neuroscience Institute and Department of Otolaryngology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, New York 10016 and Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, New York 10003.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7518-0566
Michael A LongNYU Neuroscience Institute and Department of Otolaryngology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, New York 10016 and Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, New York 10003 mlong@med.nyu.edu.
NYU Langone Health · US

Funding

Synaptic and circuit mechanisms of learned vocal productionR01NS075044 · NINDS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI MICHAEL A LONG · 2011 to 2026
$5.7M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS075044NINDS NIH HHS R01NS075044
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensory feedback is crucial for learning and performing many behaviors, but its role in the execution of complex motor sequences is poorly understood. To address this, we consider the forebrain nucleus HVC in the songbird, which contains the premotor circuitry for song production and receives multiple convergent sensory inputs. During singing, projection neurons within HVC exhibit precisely timed synaptic events that may represent the ongoing motor program or song-related sensory feedback. To distinguish between these possibilities, we recorded the membrane potential from identified HVC projection neurons in singing zebra finches. External auditory perturbations during song production did not affect synaptic inputs in these neurons. Furthermore, the systematic removal of three sensory feedback streams (auditory, proprioceptive, and vagal) did not alter the frequency or temporal precision of synaptic activity observed. These findings support a motor origin for song-related synaptic events and suggest an updated circuit model for generating behavioral sequences.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAction PotentialsAnimalsAuditory PathwaysElectrodes, ImplantedFemaleFinchesMaleMotor SkillsNeuronsProsencephalonSongbirdsSynapsesVocalization, Animalbirdsongintracellular recordingpremotorsequence generation

Identifiers

PMID25568122
PMCPMC4287148
OpenAlexW1997424419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.