Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25568115›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2015

The neural substrate for binaural masking level differences in the auditory cortex.

Heather J Gilbert, Trevor M Shackleton, Katrin Krumbholz, Alan R Palmer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. GABAergic Inhibition Underpins Hidden Hearing Loss.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  2. Age-Related Deficits in Binaural Hearing: Contribution of Peripheral and Central Effects.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Neural Correlates of the Binaural Masking Level Difference in Human Frequency-Following Responses.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Heather J GilbertMRC Institute of Hearing Research, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, United Kingdom.
Trevor M ShackletonMRC Institute of Hearing Research, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, United Kingdom trevor@ihr.mrc.ac.uk.
Katrin KrumbholzMRC Institute of Hearing Research, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, United Kingdom.
Alan R PalmerMRC Institute of Hearing Research, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, United Kingdom.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U135097126Medical Research Council MC_U135097128
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The binaural masking level difference (BMLD) is a phenomenon whereby a signal that is identical at each ear (S0), masked by a noise that is identical at each ear (N0), can be made 12-15 dB more detectable by inverting the waveform of either the tone or noise at one ear (Sπ, Nπ). Single-cell responses to BMLD stimuli were measured in the primary auditory cortex of urethane-anesthetized guinea pigs. Firing rate was measured as a function of signal level of a 500 Hz pure tone masked by low-passed white noise. Responses were similar to those reported in the inferior colliculus. At low signal levels, the response was dominated by the masker. At higher signal levels, firing rate either increased or decreased. Detection thresholds for each neuron were determined using signal detection theory. Few neurons yielded measurable detection thresholds for all stimulus conditions, with a wide range in thresholds. However, across the entire population, the lowest thresholds were consistent with human psychophysical BMLDs. As in the inferior colliculus, the shape of the firing-rate versus signal-level functions depended on the neurons' selectivity for interaural time difference. Our results suggest that, in cortex, BMLD signals are detected from increases or decreases in the firing rate, consistent with predictions of cross-correlation models of binaural processing and that the psychophysical detection threshold is based on the lowest neural thresholds across the population.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAction PotentialsAnimalsAuditory CortexAuditory ThresholdFemaleGuinea PigsMaleSound Localizationauditory cortexbinaural unmaskingBMLDhearing

Identifiers

PMID25568115
PMCPMC4287143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.