Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25567991›Full record

ArticleGenetics2015

Quality control of genotypes using heritability estimates of gene content at the marker.

Natalia S Forneris, Andres Legarra, Zulma G Vitezica, Shogo Tsuruta, Ignacio Aguilar, Ignacy Misztal, Rodolfo J C Cantet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Metafounders are related to FGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2017
    Article
  14. Walking through the statistical black boxes of plant breeding.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2016
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Natalia S FornerisDepartamento de Producción Animal, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires, C1417DSE Buenos Aires, Argentina Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Av. Rivadavia 1917, C1033AAJ Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Andres LegarraINRA, Génétique, Physiologie et Systèmes d'Elevage (GenPhySE), F-31326 Castanet-Tolosan, France Université de Toulouse, INP, ENSAT, Génétique, Physiologie et Systèmes d'Elevage (GenPhySE), F-31326 Castanet-Tolosan, France andres.legarra@toulouse.inra.fr.
Zulma G VitezicaINRA, Génétique, Physiologie et Systèmes d'Elevage (GenPhySE), F-31326 Castanet-Tolosan, France Université de Toulouse, INP, ENSAT, Génétique, Physiologie et Systèmes d'Elevage (GenPhySE), F-31326 Castanet-Tolosan, France.
Shogo TsurutaAnimal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602.
Ignacio AguilarInstituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria, Canelones 90200, Uruguay.
Ignacy MisztalAnimal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602.
Rodolfo J C CantetDepartamento de Producción Animal, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires, C1417DSE Buenos Aires, Argentina Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Av. Rivadavia 1917, C1033AAJ Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quality control filtering of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) is a key step when analyzing genomic data. Here we present a practical method to identify low-quality SNPs, meaning markers whose genotypes are wrongly assigned for a large proportion of individuals, by estimating the heritability of gene content at each marker, where gene content is the number of copies of a particular reference allele in a genotype of an animal (0, 1, or 2). If there is no mutation at the marker, gene content has an additive heritability of 1 by construction. The method uses restricted maximum likelihood (REML) to estimate heritability of gene content at each SNP and also builds a likelihood-ratio test statistic to test for zero error variance in genotyping. As a by-product, estimates of the allele frequencies of markers at the base population are obtained. Using simulated data with 10% permutation error (4% actual error) in genotyping, the method had a specificity of 0.96 (4% of correct markers are rejected) and a sensitivity of 0.99 (1% of wrong markers are accepted) if markers with heritability lower than 0.975 are discarded. Checking of Mendelian errors resulted in a lower sensitivity (0.84) for the same simulation. The proposed method is further illustrated with a real data set with genotypes from 3534 animals genotyped for 50,433 markers from the Illumina PorcineSNP60 chip and a pedigree of 6473 individuals; those markers underwent very little quality control. A total of 4099 markers with P-values lower than 0.01 were discarded based on our method, with associated estimates of heritability as low as 0.12. Contrary to other techniques, our method uses all information in the population simultaneously, can be used in any population with markers and pedigree recordings, and is simple to implement using standard software for REML estimation. Scripts for its use are provided.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticPedigreePolymorphism, Single NucleotideAnimalsGenetic MarkersGenomicsGenotyping TechniquesHumansLikelihood FunctionsOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisQuality ControlSensitivity and SpecificitySus scrofaGenetic Markersgene contentgenomic selectionGenPredquality controlREMLshared data resourceSNP

Identifiers

PMID25567991
PMCPMC4349063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.