ArticleGenetics2015
Quality control of genotypes using heritability estimates of gene content at the marker.
Article in Genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genomic information increases prediction accuracy of behavior traits of Labrador Retrievers used as guide dogs.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2026Article
- Management of genetic defects in breeding programs of species with high prolificacy.Journal of animal science · 2026Article
- Article
- Predicted breeding values for relative scrapie susceptibility for genotyped and ungenotyped sheep.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2024Article
- Interpreting single-step genomic evaluation as a neural network of three layers: pedigree, genotypes, and phenotypes.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2023Article
- Imputation of low-density marker chip data in plant breeding: Evaluation of methods based on sugar beet.The plant genome · 2022Article
- Single-step genomic evaluation with metafounders for feed conversion ratio and average daily gain in Danish Landrace and Yorkshire pigs.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2021Article
- Genome-wide association study for feed efficiency in collective cage-raised rabbits under full and restricted feeding.Animal genetics · 2020Article
- Theoretical and empirical comparisons of expected and realized relationships for the X-chromosome.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2020Article
- Bias and accuracy of dairy sheep evaluations using BLUP and SSGBLUP with metafounders and unknown parent groups.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2020Article
- Development of diagnostic SNP markers for quality assurance and control in sweetpotato [Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.] breeding programs.PloS one · 2020Article
- Estimation of indirect social genetic effects for skin lesion count in group-housed pigs by quantifying behavioral interactions1.Journal of animal science · 2019Article
- Metafounders are related to FGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2017Article
- Walking through the statistical black boxes of plant breeding.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2016Review
- Genomic prediction of unordered categorical traits: an application to subpopulation assignment in German Warmblood horses.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2016Article
- Impact of imputation methods on the amount of genetic variation captured by a single-nucleotide polymorphism panel in soybeans.BMC bioinformatics · 2016Article
- Genetic evaluation with major genes and polygenic inheritance when some animals are not genotyped using gene content multiple-trait BLUP.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2015Article
- Accuracy of estimated breeding values with genomic information on males, females, or both: an example on broiler chicken.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quality control filtering of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) is a key step when analyzing genomic data. Here we present a practical method to identify low-quality SNPs, meaning markers whose genotypes are wrongly assigned for a large proportion of individuals, by estimating the heritability of gene content at each marker, where gene content is the number of copies of a particular reference allele in a genotype of an animal (0, 1, or 2). If there is no mutation at the marker, gene content has an additive heritability of 1 by construction. The method uses restricted maximum likelihood (REML) to estimate heritability of gene content at each SNP and also builds a likelihood-ratio test statistic to test for zero error variance in genotyping. As a by-product, estimates of the allele frequencies of markers at the base population are obtained. Using simulated data with 10% permutation error (4% actual error) in genotyping, the method had a specificity of 0.96 (4% of correct markers are rejected) and a sensitivity of 0.99 (1% of wrong markers are accepted) if markers with heritability lower than 0.975 are discarded. Checking of Mendelian errors resulted in a lower sensitivity (0.84) for the same simulation. The proposed method is further illustrated with a real data set with genotypes from 3534 animals genotyped for 50,433 markers from the Illumina PorcineSNP60 chip and a pedigree of 6473 individuals; those markers underwent very little quality control. A total of 4099 markers with P-values lower than 0.01 were discarded based on our method, with associated estimates of heritability as low as 0.12. Contrary to other techniques, our method uses all information in the population simultaneously, can be used in any population with markers and pedigree recordings, and is simple to implement using standard software for REML estimation. Scripts for its use are provided.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.