Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25567849›Full record

ArticleEvolutionary applications2009

Genomic sister-disorders of neurodevelopment: an evolutionary approach.

Bernard Crespi, Kyle Summers, Steve Dorus

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolutionary applications, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. The insectan apes.Human nature (Hawthorne, N.Y.) · 2014
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Editorial: 2009 in review.Evolutionary applications · 2010
    Article
  15. Evolution in health and medicine Sackler colloquium: Comparative genomics of autism and schizophrenia.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2010
    Review
  16. Colloquium papers: Numbering the hairs on our heads: the shared challenge and promise of phenomics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2010
    Review
  17. Editorial: evolutionary medicine special issue.Evolutionary applications · 2009
    Article
  18. DUF1220 domains, cognitive disease, and human brain evolution.Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology · 2009
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Bernard CrespiDepartment of Biosciences, Simon Fraser University Burnaby, BC, Canada.
Kyle SummersDepartment of Biology, East Carolina University Greenville, NC, USA.
Steve DorusDepartment of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath Bath, UK.
East Carolina University · USSimon Fraser University · CAUniversity of Bath · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic sister-disorders are defined here as diseases mediated by duplications versus deletions of the same region. Such disorders can provide unique information concerning the genomic underpinnings of human neurodevelopment because effects of diametric variation in gene copy number on cognitive and behavioral phenotypes can be inferred. We describe evidence from the literature on deletions versus duplications for the regions underlying the best-known human neurogenetic sister-disorders, including Williams syndrome, Velocardiofacial syndrome, and Smith-Magenis syndrome, as well as the X-chromosomal conditions Klinefelter and Turner syndromes. These data suggest that diametric copy-number alterations can, like diametric alterations to imprinted genes, generate contrasting phenotypes associated with autistic-spectrum and psychotic-spectrum conditions. Genomically based perturbations to the development of the human social brain are thus apparently mediated to a notable degree by effects of variation in gene copy number. We also conducted the first analyses of positive selection for genes in the regions affected by these disorders. We found evidence consistent with adaptive evolution of protein-coding genes, or selective sweeps, for three of the four sets of sister-syndromes analyzed. These studies of selection facilitate identification of candidate genes for the phenotypes observed and lend a novel evolutionary dimension to the analysis of human cognitive architecture and neurogenetic disorders.

Indexed as

autismevolutiongene copy-number variationpositive Darwinian selectionschizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID25567849
PMCPMC3352408
OpenAlexW168382404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.