Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25567584›Full record

Trial reportImplementation science : IS2015

Improving the implementation of perioperative safety guidelines using a multifaceted intervention approach: protocol of the IMPROVE study, a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial.

Yvette E J J M Emond, Hiske Calsbeek, Steven Teerenstra, Gerrit J A Bloo, Gert P Westert, Johan Damen, André P Wolff, Hub C Wollersheim

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Implementation science : IS, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Tailored interventions to address determinants of practice.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yvette E J J M EmondRadboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, PO Box 9101, 114 IQ healthcare, 6500, HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Yvette.Emond@radboudumc.nl.
Hiske CalsbeekRadboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, PO Box 9101, 114 IQ healthcare, 6500, HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. H.Calsbeek@radboudumc.nl.
Steven TeerenstraRadboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, PO Box 9101, 114 IQ healthcare, 6500, HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Steven.Teerenstra@radboudumc.nl.
Gerrit J A BlooRadboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, PO Box 9101, 114 IQ healthcare, 6500, HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Gerrit.Bloo@radboudumc.nl.
Gert P WestertRadboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, PO Box 9101, 114 IQ healthcare, 6500, HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Gert.Westert@radboudumc.nl.
Johan DamenRadboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Care, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Johan.Damen@radboudumc.nl.
André P WolffRadboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Care, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Andre.Wolff@radboudumc.nl.
Hub C WollersheimRadboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, PO Box 9101, 114 IQ healthcare, 6500, HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Hub.Wollersheim@radboudumc.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study is initiated to evaluate the effects, costs, and feasibility at the hospital and patient level of an evidence-based strategy to improve the use of Dutch perioperative safety guidelines. Based on current knowledge, expert opinions and expertise of the project team, a multifaceted implementation strategy has been developed. METHODS/

designThis is a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial including nine representative hospitals across The Netherlands. Hospitals are stratified into three groups according to hospital type and geographical location and randomized in terms of the period for receipt of the intervention. All adult surgical patients meeting the inclusion criteria are assessed for patient outcomes. The implementation strategy includes education, audit and feedback, organizational interventions (e.g., local embedding of the guidelines), team-directed interventions (e.g., multi-professional team training), reminders, as well as patient-mediated interventions (e.g., patient safety cards). To tailor the implementation activities, we developed a questionnaire to identify barriers for effective guideline adherence, based on (a) a theoretical framework for classifying barriers and facilitators, (b) an instrument for measuring determinants of innovations, and (c) 19 semi-structured interviews with perioperative key professionals. Primary outcome is guideline adherence measured at the hospital (i.e., cluster) and patient levels by a set of perioperative Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs), which was developed parallel to the perioperative guidelines. Secondary outcomes at the patient level are in-hospital complications, postoperative wound infections and mortality, length of hospital stay, and unscheduled transfer to the intensive care unit, non-elective readmission to the hospital and unplanned reoperation, all within 30 days after the initial surgery. Also, patient safety culture and team climate will be studied as potential determinants. Finally, a process evaluation is conducted to identify the compliance with the implementation strategy, as well as an economic evaluation to assess the costs. Data sources are registered clinical data and surveys. There is no form of blinding. DISCUSSION: The perioperative setting is an unexplored area with respect to implementation issues. This study is expected to yield important new evidence about the effects of a multifaceted approach on guideline adherence in the perioperative care setting.

trial registrationDutch trial registry: NTR3568.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicAdultClinical ProtocolsCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleGuideline AdherenceHospitalsHumansMaleNetherlandsPatient SafetyPerioperative CarePostoperative Complications

Identifiers

PMID25567584
PMCPMC4296536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.