Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25567494›Full record

ArticleEvolutionary applications2008

Adaptation, migration or extirpation: climate change outcomes for tree populations.

Sally N Aitken, Sam Yeaman, Jason A Holliday, Tongli Wang, Sierra Curtis-McLane

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolutionary applications, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 446 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
446citing papers in PubMed
87.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

446 citing papers in PubMed, 2,153 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

386 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sally N AitkenCentre for Forest Conservation Genetics and Department of Forest Sciences, University of British Columbia Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Sam YeamanDepartment of Zoology, University of British Columbia Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Jason A HollidayCentre for Forest Conservation Genetics and Department of Forest Sciences, University of British Columbia Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Tongli WangCentre for Forest Conservation Genetics and Department of Forest Sciences, University of British Columbia Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Sierra Curtis-McLaneCentre for Forest Conservation Genetics and Department of Forest Sciences, University of British Columbia Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
University of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Species distribution models predict a wholesale redistribution of trees in the next century, yet migratory responses necessary to spatially track climates far exceed maximum post-glacial rates. The extent to which populations will adapt will depend upon phenotypic variation, strength of selection, fecundity, interspecific competition, and biotic interactions. Populations of temperate and boreal trees show moderate to strong clines in phenology and growth along temperature gradients, indicating substantial local adaptation. Traits involved in local adaptation appear to be the product of small effects of many genes, and the resulting genotypic redundancy combined with high fecundity may facilitate rapid local adaptation despite high gene flow. Gene flow with preadapted alleles from warmer climates may promote adaptation and migration at the leading edge, while populations at the rear will likely face extirpation. Widespread species with large populations and high fecundity are likely to persist and adapt, but will likely suffer adaptational lag for a few generations. As all tree species will be suffering lags, interspecific competition may weaken, facilitating persistence under suboptimal conditions. Species with small populations, fragmented ranges, low fecundity, or suffering declines due to introduced insects or diseases should be candidates for facilitated migration.

Indexed as

coniferecological geneticsforestgene flowgenomicspopulationselectionspecies distribution models

Identifiers

PMID25567494
PMCPMC3352395
OpenAlexW2156265209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.