Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25567156›Full record

ArticleIndustrial health2015

Case of accelerated silicosis in a sandblaster.

Beáta Hutyrová, Petra Smolková, Marie Nakládalová, Tomáš Tichý, Vítězslav Kolek

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Industrial health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Animal models of silicosis: fishing for new therapeutic targets and treatments.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2023
    Review
  2. Hazardous dusts from the fabrication of countertop: a review.Archives of environmental & occupational health · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Dynamic assessing silica particle-induced pulmonary fibrosis and associated regulation of long non-coding RNA expression in Wistar rats.Genes and environment : the official journal of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Beáta HutyrováDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Petra Smolková
Marie Nakládalová
Tomáš Tichý
Vítězslav Kolek

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sandblasting is traditionally known as a high-risk profession for potential development of lung silicosis. Reported is a case of a sandblaster with confirmed accelerated silicosis, a condition rather rarely diagnosed in the Czech Republic. Initially, the patient presented with progressive dry cough and exertional dyspnoea. In the early diagnostic process, a possible occupational aetiology was considered given his occupational history and known high-risk exposure to respirable silica particles confirmed by industrial hygiene assessment at the patient's workplace. The condition was confirmed by clinical, histological and autopsy findings. The patient died during lung transplantation, less than five years from diagnosis.

Indexed as

MetallurgyAdultDisease ProgressionHumansMaleOccupational DiseasesOccupational ExposureSilicon DioxideSilicosisTime FactorsSilicon Dioxide

Identifiers

PMID25567156
PMCPMC4380606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.