Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25567089›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2015

Distracting visuospatial attention while approaching an obstacle reduces the toe-obstacle clearance.

On-Yee Lo, Paul van Donkelaar, Li-Shan Chou

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

On-Yee LoDepartment of Human Physiology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, 97403, USA.
Paul van Donkelaar
Li-Shan Chou
University of Oregon · USUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obstacle crossing during walking requires visuospatial attention to identify the obstacle, so that individuals can integrate visual and somatosensory information for raising the foot with appropriate height and timing without being tripped. However, the interaction between control of foot trajectory and orientation of visuospatial attention during obstacle crossing is complicated and remains unclear. This study probed where attention is directed when approaching and stepping over an obstacle during gait and examined how the presence of the obstacle affects the distribution of attention during walking. Eleven young healthy adults performed a visuospatial attention task while standing (Stand), crossing over an obstacle placed either before (ObsBefore) or after (ObsAfter) the visual target, or crossing without the visual target (ObsOnly). Toe-obstacle clearance was reduced for the trailing leg in the ObsAfter condition but remained the same for the ObsBefore and ObsOnly conditions. In addition, the accuracy rate of the visuospatial attention task tended to be higher at the locations closer to the obstacle. Taken together, these results demonstrate that visuospatial attention and the processes underlying obstacle crossing during locomotion interact in both a spatially and temporally dependent manner.

Indexed as

ToesAdultAttentionBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleHumansLocomotionMalePsychomotor PerformanceSpace PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID25567089
OpenAlexW2004125118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.