ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2015
Self-controlled case-series study to verify the effect of adherence to Beta-blockers in secondary prevention of myocardial infarction.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A propensity score approach and a partitioned approach for the self-controlled case series design to evaluate safety of a 2-dose vaccine series: application to myocarditis/pericarditis following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination.American journal of epidemiology · 2025Article
- A Query Engine for Self-controlled Case Series, with an application to COVID-19 EHR data.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2023Article
- Association Between Subsequent Hospitalizations and Recurrent Acute Myocardial Infarction Within 1 Year After Acute Myocardial Infarction.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2020Article
- Relationships among medication adherence, lifestyle modification, and health-related quality of life in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a cross-sectional study.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBeta-blockers (BB) are recommended in secondary prevention of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), but adherence to prescription medication is a recognized problem. Most literature on the consequences of poor adherence to prescribed BB is limited by the possibility of "healthy adherer bias" and better-designed studies have been advocated. METHODS AND
resultsWe investigated the association between adherence to BB prescription and risk of subsequent AMIs using the self-controlled case series design, which allows improved control of interpersonal confounding, being based on intrapersonal comparisons. From all the 30 089 patients hospitalized for AMI in the years 2009-2011 in an Italian region we selected those that suffered subsequent AMIs at days 31 to 365 from discharge (1328), and then the 1207 that had at least one BB prescription collected at any of the regional pharmacies. Using information on prescriptions, each individual's observation time was then divided into periods exposed or unexposed to BB and the relative AMI incidence rate ratios (IRR) of BB exposure were estimated by conditional Poisson regression. The IRR (rate of recurrent AMI in exposed versus unexposed periods) was 0.79 (95% CI 0.69 to 0.90, P=0.001). Various sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness to possible failure of assumptions, ie, considering only first recurrences (IRR 0.76, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.88, P<0.001), excluding cardiovascular fatalities (IRR 0.76, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.89, P<0.001), and excluding individuals with long hospital admissions (IRR 0.60, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.83, P=0.002).
conclusionsAdherence to recommended BB therapy was associated with a 20% reduction of recurrent AMIs, consistently with previous research, but with decreased concerns about healthy-adherer bias.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.