Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25566972›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2015

Amphetamine self-administration and dopamine function: assessment of gene × environment interactions in Lewis and Fischer 344 rats.

Andrew C Meyer, Michael T Bardo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. HIV-1 Transgenic Rat Prefrontal Cortex Hyper-Excitability is Enhanced by Cocaine Self-Administration.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2016
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew C MeyerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, UHC-SATC Room 1415, 1 So. Prospect Street, Burlington, VT, 05401, USA. acmeyer@uvm.edu.
Michael T BardoDepartment of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
University of Kentucky · USUniversity of Vermont · US

Funding

Training and Pilot CoreP50DA005312 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI BARDO, MICHAEL T · 1987 to 2016
$19.5M
NOVELTY, DOPAMINE AND RESPONSE TO AMPHETAMINER01DA012964 · NIDA · YAUPON THERAPEUTICS, INC. · PI BARDO, MICHAEL T · 2000 to 2013
$3.7M
NIDA NIH HHS DA05312NIDA NIH HHS DA12964NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA005312NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA012964
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationalePrevious research suggests both genetic and environmental influences on substance abuse vulnerability.

objectivesThe current work sought to investigate the interaction of genes and environment on the acquisition of amphetamine self-administration as well as amphetamine-stimulated dopamine (DA) release in nucleus accumbens shell using in vivo microdialysis.

methodsInbred Lewis (LEW) and Fischer (F344) rat strains were raised in either an enriched condition (EC), social condition (SC), or isolated condition (IC). Acquisition of amphetamine self-administration (0.1 mg/kg/infusion) was determined across an incrementing daily fixed ratio (FR) schedule. In a separate cohort of rats, extracellular DA and the metabolite 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC) were measured in the nucleus accumbens shell following an acute amphetamine injection (1 mg/kg).

results"Addiction-prone" LEW rats had greater acquisition of amphetamine self-administration on a FR1 schedule compared to "addiction-resistant" F344 rats when raised in the SC environment. These genetic differences were negated in both the EC and IC environments, with enrichment buffering against self-administration and isolation enhancing self-administration in both strains. On a FR5 schedule, the isolation-induced increase in amphetamine self-administration was greater in F344 than LEW rats. While no group differences were obtained in extracellular DA, gene × environment differences were obtained in extracellular levels of the metabolite DOPAC. In IC rats only, LEW rats showed attenuation in the amphetamine-induced decrease in DOPAC compared to F344 rats. IC LEW rats also had an attenuated DOPAC response to amphetamine compared to EC LEW rats.

conclusionsThe current results demonstrate gene × environment interactions in amphetamine self-administration and amphetamine-induced changes in extracellular DOPAC in nucleus accumbens (NAc) shell. However, the behavioral and neurochemical differences were not related directly, indicating that mechanisms independent of DA metabolism in NAc shell likely mediate the gene × environment effects in amphetamine self-administration.

Indexed as

Gene-Environment Interaction3,4-Dihydroxyphenylacetic AcidAmphetamineAnimalsDopamineMaleMicrodialysisNucleus AccumbensRatsRats, Inbred F344Rats, Inbred LewSelf AdministrationSpecies Specificity3,4-Dihydroxyphenylacetic AcidAmphetamineDopamineAmphetamineDopamineEnvironmental enrichmentFischer 344Gene × environment interactionsInbred rat strainsLewisMicrodialysisSelf-administration

Identifiers

PMID25566972
PMCPMC4465863
OpenAlexW2038943806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.