Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25566882›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2015

Cytoskeleton remodelling of confluent epithelial cells cultured on porous substrates.

Jan Rother, Matthias Büchsenschütz-Göbeler, Helen Nöding, Siegfried Steltenkamp, Konrad Samwer, Andreas Janshoff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Insights intoMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  10. The Research Advance of Cell BridgesFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. PeakForce Tapping resolves individual microvilli on living cells.Journal of molecular recognition : JMR · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jan RotherInstitute of Physical Chemistry, University of Goettingen, Tammannstrasse 6, Göttingen 37077, Germany.
Matthias Büchsenschütz-GöbelerI. Institute of Physics, University of Goettingen, Friedrich-Hund Platz 1, Göttingen 37077, Germany.
Helen NödingInstitute of Physical Chemistry, University of Goettingen, Tammannstrasse 6, Göttingen 37077, Germany.
Siegfried SteltenkampResearch Center CAESAR, Ludwig-Erhard-Allee 2, Bonn 53175, Germany.
Konrad SamwerI. Institute of Physics, University of Goettingen, Friedrich-Hund Platz 1, Göttingen 37077, Germany.
Andreas JanshoffInstitute of Physical Chemistry, University of Goettingen, Tammannstrasse 6, Göttingen 37077, Germany ajansho@gwdg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The impact of substrate topography on the morphological and mechanical properties of confluent MDCK-II cells cultured on porous substrates was scrutinized by means of various imaging techniques as well as atomic force microscopy comprising force volume and microrheology measurements. Regardless of the pore size, ranging from 450 to 5500 nm in diameter, cells were able to span the pores. They did not crawl into the holes or grow around the pores. Generally, we found that cells cultured on non-porous surfaces are stiffer, i.e. cortical tension rises from 0.1 to 0.3 mN m(-1), and less fluid than cells grown over pores. The mechanical data are corroborated by electron microscopy imaging showing more cytoskeletal filaments on flat samples in comparison to porous ones. By contrast, cellular compliance increases with pore size and cells display a more fluid-like behaviour on larger pores. Interestingly, cells on pores larger than 3500 nm produce thick actin bundles that bridge the pores and thereby strengthen the contact zone of the cells.

Indexed as

Actin CytoskeletonAnimalsDogsEpithelial CellsMadin Darby Canine Kidney CellsPorosityatomic force microscopycytoskeletonMDCK-II cellsmicrorheologyporous substratestension

Identifiers

PMID25566882
PMCPMC4305408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.