Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25566825›Full record

ReviewDrug safety2015

Risk of anaphylaxis with repeated courses of rasburicase: a Research on Adverse Drug Events and Reports (RADAR) project.

Katherine C Allen, Amanda H Champlain, Jonathan A Cotliar, Steven M Belknap, Dennis P West, Jayesh Mehta, Steven M Trifilio

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drug safety, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A case report of fatal anaphylaxis on first exposure to rasburicase just before lymphoma treatment.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Enhancing the Response Rate to Recombinant Uricases in Patients with Gout.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2022
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Katherine C AllenPharmacy Department, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA.
Amanda H Champlain
Jonathan A Cotliar
Steven M Belknap
Dennis P West
Jayesh Mehta
Steven M Trifilio
Northwestern University · USNorthwestern Memorial Hospital · USSt. Clair College · CAUniversity of Wisconsin–Superior · US

Funding

Research for Adverse Drug-Events And Reports (RADAR)R01CA102713 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI WEST, DENNIS PAUL · 2003 to 2010
$3.2M
Research on Adverse Drug Events and Reports: Novel Multiple Myeloma DrugsR01CA125077 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI WEST, DENNIS PAUL · 2007 to 2009
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA102713NCI NIH HHS R01CA102713NCI NIH HHS R01 CA125077NCI NIH HHS R01CA125077
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRasburicase, a recombinant urate oxidase, is used to rapidly metabolize uric acid in patients with hyperuricaemia. Rasburicase is an immunogenic therapeutic protein, which has been shown to elicit antibody response in 64 % of healthy volunteers within 1-6 weeks after the initial course, with persistent antibodies for over 1 year. Drug labelling indicates that anaphylaxis rarely occurs (in <1 % of patients) after a single course of therapy with rasburicase, but there are no data available on the incidence of anaphylaxis in patients receiving a subsequent rasburicase course.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to determine the incidence of anaphylaxis after multiple treatment courses of rasburicase.

methodsA retrospective chart review was performed on 97 consecutively treated patients who received repeated courses of rasburicase for hyperuricaemia.

resultsNone of the 97 patients who were reviewed experienced anaphylaxis during the first rasburicase course; however, six patients (6.2 %) experienced anaphylaxis during a subsequent rasburicase treatment course (p = 0.03).

conclusionAnaphylaxis after a second course of rasburicase appears to occur more frequently than described in the US Food and Drug Administration-approved package insert for initial treatment courses. Given the serious nature of anaphylactic events, caution is advised when administering repeated courses of rasburicase.

Indexed as

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsAnaphylaxisDose-Response Relationship, DrugGout SuppressantsHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicRetrospective StudiesRiskUrate OxidaseGout SuppressantsrasburicaseUrate Oxidase

Identifiers

PMID25566825
PMCPMC4355936
OpenAlexW1966053262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.