ReviewFrontiers in genetics2014
Mito-nuclear co-evolution: the positive and negative sides of functional ancient mutations.
Review in Frontiers in genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.
- Coordinated Evolutionary Rates in Oxidative Phosphorylation Complexes of Papilionoid Legumes: Cytonuclear Coevolution and Relaxed Selection.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Male fertility restoration of tetrad pollen sterility in BCBMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Exploring the Impact of Mitonuclear Discordance on Disease in Latin American Admixed Populations.Genes · 2025Article
- Behavioural underpinning of mito-nuclear discordances: insights from fire salamanders.Royal Society open science · 2024Article
- Comprehensive analysis of the mitochondrial genome ofFrontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Article
- Controlled Level of Contamination Coupled to Deep Sequencing (CoLoC-seq) Probes the Global Localisation Topology of Organelle Transcriptomes.Bio-protocol · 2023Article
- A chromosome-scale genome assembly and evaluation of mtDNA variation in the willow leaf beetle Chrysomela aeneicollis.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2023Article
- Investigating the Impact of a Curse: Diseases, Population Isolation, Evolution and the Mother's Curse.Genes · 2022Review
- Genomic Signatures of Mitonuclear Coevolution in Mammals.Molecular biology and evolution · 2022Article
- Mitonuclear incompatibility as a hidden driver behind the genome ancestry of African admixed cattle.BMC biology · 2022Article
- Exploring the Effects of Mitonuclear Interactions on Mitochondrial DNA Gene Expression in Humans.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Extensive alternative splicing triggered by mitonuclear mismatch in naturally introgressed Rhinolophus bats.Ecology and evolution · 2021Article
- MitImpact 3: modeling the residue interaction network of the Respiratory Chain subunits.Nucleic acids research · 2021Article
- The role of selection in the evolution of marine turtles mitogenomes.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Yeast pentatricopeptide protein Dmr1 (Ccm1) binds a repetitive AU-rich motif in the small subunit mitochondrial ribosomal RNA.RNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2020Article
- Mitonuclear Interactions in the Maintenance of Mitochondrial Integrity.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Co-evolution in the Jungle: From Leafcutter Ant Colonies to Chromosomal Ends.Journal of molecular evolution · 2020Review
- Strong selective effects of mitochondrial DNA on the nuclear genome.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
- Extreme mito-nuclear discordance in a peninsular lizard: the role of drift, selection, and climate.Heredity · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Most cell functions are carried out by interacting factors, thus underlying the functional importance of genetic interactions between genes, termed epistasis. Epistasis could be under strong selective pressures especially in conditions where the mutation rate of one of the interacting partners notably differs from the other. Accordingly, the order of magnitude higher mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) mutation rate as compared to the nuclear DNA (nDNA) of all tested animals, should influence systems involving mitochondrial-nuclear (mito-nuclear) interactions. Such is the case of the energy producing oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) and mitochondrial translational machineries which are comprised of factors encoded by both the mtDNA and the nDNA. Additionally, the mitochondrial RNA transcription and mtDNA replication systems are operated by nDNA-encoded proteins that bind mtDNA regulatory elements. As these systems are central to cell life there is strong selection toward mito-nuclear co-evolution to maintain their function. However, it is unclear whether (A) mito-nuclear co-evolution befalls only to retain mitochondrial functions during evolution or, also, (B) serves as an adaptive tool to adjust for the evolving energetic demands as species' complexity increases. As the first step to answer these questions we discuss evidence of both negative and adaptive (positive) selection acting on the mtDNA and nDNA-encoded genes and the effect of both types of selection on mito-nuclear interacting factors. Emphasis is given to the crucial role of recurrent ancient (nodal) mutations in such selective events. We apply this point-of-view to the three available types of mito-nuclear co-evolution: protein-protein (within the OXPHOS system), protein-RNA (mainly within the mitochondrial ribosome), and protein-DNA (at the mitochondrial replication and transcription machineries).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.