ReviewFrontiers in neurology2014
Tinnitus what and where: an ecological framework.
Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tinnitus Measured in Everyday Life: A Literature Review of Ecological Momentary Assessment Studies.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2025Review
- Development and Psychometric Validation of Tinnitus Qualities and Impact Questionnaire.Clinics and practice · 2025Article
- Altered auditory brainstem responses are post-acute sequela of SARS-CoV-2 (PASC).Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A scoping review of tinnitus research undertaken by New Zealand researchers: Aotearoa-an international hotspot for tinnitus innovation and collaboration.Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand · 2025Review
- A scoping review of the spatial perception of tinnitus and a guideline for the minimum reporting of tinnitus location.Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand · 2025Review
- Integrating Distribution-Based and Anchor-Based Techniques to Identify Minimal Important Change for the Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI) Questionnaire.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- A randomized single-blind controlled trial of a prototype digital polytherapeutic for tinnitus.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Too Blind to See the Elephant? Why Neuroscientists Ought to Be Interested in Tinnitus.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2021Review
- Behavioral Outcomes and Neural Network Modeling of a Novel, Putative, Recategorization Sound Therapy.Brain sciences · 2021Article
- Emerging Topics in the Behavioral Neuroscience of Tinnitus.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2021Article
- Momentary Analysis of Tinnitus: Considering the Patient.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2021Article
- Principles and Methods for Psychoacoustic Evaluation of Tinnitus.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2021Article
- A State-of-Art Review of Digital Technologies for the Next Generation of Tinnitus Therapeutics.Frontiers in digital health · 2021Review
- Article
- Sense and Sensibility: A Review of the Behavioral Neuroscience of Tinnitus Sound Therapy and a New Typology.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2021Review
- Perceptual Dimensions Underlying Tinnitus-Like Sounds.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2020Article
- The Neural Bases of Tinnitus: Lessons from Deafness and Cochlear Implants.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020Review
- Right-Ear Advantage for Speech-in-Noise Recognition in Patients with Nonlateralized Tinnitus and Normal Hearing Sensitivity.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2018Article
- A Mixed-Methods Trial of Broad Band Noise and Nature Sounds for Tinnitus Therapy: Group and Individual Responses Modeled under the Adaptation Level Theory of Tinnitus.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2017Article
- A State-of-the-Art Review: Personalization of Tinnitus Sound Therapy.Frontiers in psychology · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tinnitus is an interaction of the environment, cognition, and plasticity. The connection between the individual with tinnitus and their world seldom receives attention in neurophysiological research. As well as changes in cell excitability, an individual's culture and beliefs, and work and social environs may all influence how tinnitus is perceived. In this review, an ecological framework for current neurophysiological evidence is considered. The model defines tinnitus as the perception of an auditory object in the absence of an acoustic event. It is hypothesized that following deafferentation: adaptive feature extraction, schema, and semantic object formation processes lead to tinnitus in a manner predicted by Adaptation Level Theory (1, 2). Evidence from physiological studies is compared to the tenants of the proposed ecological model. The consideration of diverse events within an ecological context may unite seemingly disparate neurophysiological models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.