Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25566175›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neurology2014

Effects of low-level blast exposure on the nervous system: is there really a controversy?

Gregory A Elder, James R Stone, Stephen T Ahlers

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Expression of GFAP and Tau Following Blast Exposure in the Cerebral Cortex of Ferrets.Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gregory A ElderNeurology Service, James J. Peters Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center , Bronx, NY , USA ; Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai , New York, NY , USA ; Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai , New York, NY , USA ; Friedman Brain Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai , New York, NY , USA.
James R StoneDepartment of Radiology, University of Virginia , Charlottesville, VA , USA ; Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia , Charlottesville, VA , USA.
Stephen T AhlersDepartment of Neurotrauma, Operational and Undersea Medicine Directorate, Naval Medical Research Center , Silver Spring, MD , USA.
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USNaval Medical Research Command · USUniversity of Virginia · US

Funding

Neurobiological Consequences of Blast Injury in a Rat Model of mTBII01RX000179 · VA · JAMES J PETERS VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI ELDER, GREGORY A. · 2009 to 2014
–
The Neurobiology of Blast-Related Brain Injury in a Rat Model of mTBII01RX000996 · VA · JAMES J PETERS VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI ELDER, GREGORY A. · 2014 to 2018
–
RRD VA I01 RX000179RRD VA I01 RX000996
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-pressure blast waves can cause extensive CNS injury in human beings. However, in combat settings, such as Iraq and Afghanistan, lower level exposures associated with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) or subclinical exposure have been much more common. Yet controversy exists concerning what traits can be attributed to low-level blast, in large part due to the difficulty of distinguishing blast-related mTBI from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). We describe how TBI is defined in human beings and the problems posed in using current definitions to recognize blast-related mTBI. We next consider the problem of applying definitions of human mTBI to animal models, in particular that TBI severity in human beings is defined in relation to alteration of consciousness at the time of injury, which typically cannot be assessed in animals. However, based on outcome assessments, a condition of "low-level" blast exposure can be defined in animals that likely approximates human mTBI or subclinical exposure. We review blast injury modeling in animals noting that inconsistencies in experimental approach have contributed to uncertainty over the effects of low-level blast. Yet, animal studies show that low-level blast pressure waves are transmitted to the brain. In brain, low-level blast exposures cause behavioral, biochemical, pathological, and physiological effects on the nervous system including the induction of PTSD-related behavioral traits in the absence of a psychological stressor. We review the relationship of blast exposure to chronic neurodegenerative diseases noting the paradoxical lowering of Abeta by blast, which along with other observations suggest that blast-related TBI is pathophysiologically distinct from non-blast TBI. Human neuroimaging studies show that blast-related mTBI is associated with a variety of chronic effects that are unlikely to be explained by co-morbid PTSD. We conclude that abundant evidence supports low-level blast as having long-term effects on the nervous system.

Indexed as

animal modelsblasthuman studiespost-traumatic stress disordertraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID25566175
PMCPMC4271615
OpenAlexW2047894505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.