Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25566137›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2014

Walking boosts your performance in making additions and subtractions.

Filomena Anelli, Luisa Lugli, Giulia Baroni, Anna M Borghi, Roberto Nicoletti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Filomena AnelliDepartment of Psychology, University of Bologna Bologna, Italy ; Department of Philosophy and Communication Studies, University of Bologna Bologna, Italy.
Luisa LugliDepartment of Philosophy and Communication Studies, University of Bologna Bologna, Italy.
Giulia BaroniDepartment of Philosophy and Communication Studies, University of Bologna Bologna, Italy.
Anna M BorghiDepartment of Psychology, University of Bologna Bologna, Italy ; Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, Italian National Research Council Roma, Italy.
Roberto NicolettiDepartment of Philosophy and Communication Studies, University of Bologna Bologna, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous research demonstrates that the processing of spatial information and numerical magnitude are strictly interwoven. Recent studies also provide converging evidence that number processing is influenced by body movements. In the present study we further investigate this issue by focusing on whether and how motions experienced with the whole body can influence arithmetical calculations. We asked participants to make additions or subtractions while experiencing leftward and rightward motions. Data revealed the emergence of a congruency effect between the orientation inferred by the type of arithmetical calculations and the type of motions experienced along an horizontal axis.

Indexed as

arithmetical calculationsbody motionembodied cognitionhorizontal axisnumerical cognition

Identifiers

PMID25566137
PMCPMC4271511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.