Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25566086›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2014

Proteasome inhibition slightly improves cardiac function in mice with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Saskia Schlossarek, Sonia R Singh, Birgit Geertz, Herbert Schulz, Silke Reischmann, Norbert Hübner, Lucie Carrier

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Calpains as Potential Therapeutic Targets for Myocardial Hypertrophy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Genome-Wide RNAi Screen Identifies Regulators of Cardiomyocyte Necrosis.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Saskia SchlossarekDepartment of Experimental Pharmacology and Toxicology, Cardiovascular Research Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf Hamburg, Germany ; German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK) Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Germany.
Sonia R SinghDepartment of Experimental Pharmacology and Toxicology, Cardiovascular Research Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf Hamburg, Germany ; German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK) Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Germany.
Birgit GeertzDepartment of Experimental Pharmacology and Toxicology, Cardiovascular Research Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf Hamburg, Germany ; German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK) Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Germany.
Herbert SchulzMax-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine (MDC) Berlin, Germany ; German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK) Berlin, Germany.
Silke ReischmannDepartment of Experimental Pharmacology and Toxicology, Cardiovascular Research Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf Hamburg, Germany ; German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK) Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Germany.
Norbert HübnerMax-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine (MDC) Berlin, Germany ; German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK) Berlin, Germany.
Lucie CarrierDepartment of Experimental Pharmacology and Toxicology, Cardiovascular Research Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf Hamburg, Germany ; German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK) Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Germany.
Universität Hamburg · DEGerman Centre for Cardiovascular Research · DEMax Delbrück Center · DEUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A growing line of evidence indicates a dysfunctional ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) in cardiac diseases. Anti-hypertrophic effects and improved cardiac function have been reported after treatment with proteasome inhibitors in experimental models of cardiac hypertrophy. Here we tested whether proteasome inhibition could also reverse the disease phenotype in a genetically-modified mouse model of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), which carries a mutation in Mybpc3, encoding the myofilament protein cardiac myosin-binding protein C. At 7 weeks of age, homozygous mutant mice (KI) have 39% higher left ventricular mass-to-body-weight ratio and 29% lower fractional area shortening (FAS) than wild-type (WT) mice. Both groups were treated with epoxomicin (0.5 mg/kg/day) or vehicle for 1 week via osmotic minipumps. Epoxomicin inhibited the chymotrypsin-like activity by ~50% in both groups. All parameters of cardiac hypertrophy (including the fetal gene program) were not affected by epoxomicin treatment in both groups. In contrast, FAS was 12% and 35% higher in epoxomicin-treated than vehicle-treated WT and KI mice, respectively. To identify which genes or pathways could be involved in this positive effect, we performed a transcriptome analysis in KI and WT neonatal cardiac myocytes, treated or not with the proteasome inhibitor MG132 (1 μM, 24 h). This revealed 103 genes (four-fold difference; 5% FDR) which are commonly regulated in both KI and WT cardiac myocytes. Thus, even in genetically-modified mice with manifest HCM, proteasome inhibition showed beneficial effects, at least with regard to cardiac function. Targeting the UPS in cardiac diseases remains therefore a therapeutic option.

Indexed as

cardiomyopathyhypertrophicMybpc3proteasome inhibitorstransgenic miceubiquitin-proteasome system

Identifiers

PMID25566086
PMCPMC4267180
OpenAlexW1979975201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.