Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25566020›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2014

Neurofeedback of slow cortical potentials: neural mechanisms and feasibility of a placebo-controlled design in healthy adults.

Holger Gevensleben, Björn Albrecht, Henry Lütcke, Tibor Auer, Wan Ilma Dewiputri, Renate Schweizer, Gunther Moll, Hartmut Heinrich, Aribert Rothenberger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Holger GevenslebenChild and Adolescent Psychiatry, University Medical Center (UMG) Göttingen, Germany.
Björn AlbrechtChild and Adolescent Psychiatry, University Medical Center (UMG) Göttingen, Germany.
Henry LütckeBiomedizinische NMR Forschungs GmbH, MPI for Biophysical Chemistry Göttingen, Germany ; Scientific IT Services, ETH Zürich Zürich, Switzerland.
Tibor AuerBiomedizinische NMR Forschungs GmbH, MPI for Biophysical Chemistry Göttingen, Germany ; 3MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University Cambridge Cambridge, UK.
Wan Ilma DewiputriBiomedizinische NMR Forschungs GmbH, MPI for Biophysical Chemistry Göttingen, Germany ; Department of Neuroscience, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia Pulau Pinang, Malaysia.
Renate SchweizerBiomedizinische NMR Forschungs GmbH, MPI for Biophysical Chemistry Göttingen, Germany.
Gunther MollDepartment of Child and Adolescent Mental Health, University Hospital of Erlangen Erlangen, Germany.
Hartmut HeinrichDepartment of Child and Adolescent Mental Health, University Hospital of Erlangen Erlangen, Germany ; kbo-Heckscher-Klinikum Munich, Germany.
Aribert RothenbergerChild and Adolescent Psychiatry, University Medical Center (UMG) Göttingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To elucidate basic mechanisms underlying neurofeedback we investigated neural mechanisms of training of slow cortical potentials (SCPs) by considering EEG- and fMRI. Additionally, we analyzed the feasibility of a double-blind, placebo-controlled design in NF research based on regulation performance during treatment sessions and self-assessment of the participants. Twenty healthy adults participated in 16 sessions of SCPs training: 9 participants received regular SCP training, 11 participants received sham feedback. At three time points (pre, intermediate, post) fMRI and EEG/ERP-measurements were conducted during a continuous performance test (CPT). Performance-data during the sessions (regulation performance) in the treatment group and the placebo group were analyzed. Analysis of EEG-activity revealed in the SCP group a strong enhancement of the CNV (electrode Cz) at the intermediate assessment, followed by a decrease back to baseline at the post-treatment assessment. In contrast, in the placebo group a continuous but smaller increase of the CNV could be obtained from pre to post assessment. The increase of the CNV in the SCP group at intermediate testing was superior to the enhancement in the placebo group. The changes of the CNV were accompanied by a continuous improvement in the test performance of the CPT from pre to intermediate to post assessment comparable in both groups. The change of the CNV in the SCP group is interpreted as an indicator of neural plasticity and efficiency while an increase of the CNV in the placebo group might reflect learning and improved timing due to the frequent task repetition. In the fMRI analysis evidence was obtained for neuronal plasticity. After regular SCP neurofeedback activation in the posterior parietal cortex decreased from the pre- to the intermediate measurement and increased again in the post measurement, inversely following the U-shaped increase and decrease of the tCNV EEG amplitude in the SCP-trained group. Furthermore, we found a localized increase of activity in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). Analyses of the estimation of treatment assignment by the participants indicate feasibility of blinding. Participants could not assess treatment assignment confidently. Participants of the SCP-group improved regulation capability during treatment sessions (in contrast to the participants of the placebo-group), although regulation capability appeared to be instable, presumably due to diminished confidence in the training (SCP- or sham-training). Our results indicate that SCP training in healthy adults might lead to functional changes in neuronal circuits serving cognitive preparation even after a limited number of sessions.

Indexed as

anterior cingulate cortexCNVEEG-biofeedbackfMRIneurofeedbackSCP training

Identifiers

PMID25566020
PMCPMC4263073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.