Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25565983›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in systems neuroscience2014

Neural representation of calling songs and their behavioral relevance in the grasshopper auditory system.

Gundula Meckenhäuser, Stefanie Krämer, Farzad Farkhooi, Bernhard Ronacher, Martin P Nawrot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A spiking neural program for sensorimotor control during foraging in flying insects.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  4. Robustness of an innate releasing mechanism against degradation of acoustic communication signals in the grasshopper Chorthippus biguttulus.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gundula MeckenhäuserNeuroinformatics and Theoretical Neuroscience, Department of Biology, Chemistry and Pharmacy, Institute of Biology, Freie Universität Berlin Berlin, Germany.
Stefanie KrämerBehavioural Physiology Group, Department of Biology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Berlin, Germany.
Farzad FarkhooiNeuroinformatics and Theoretical Neuroscience, Department of Biology, Chemistry and Pharmacy, Institute of Biology, Freie Universität Berlin Berlin, Germany ; Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Berlin, Germany.
Bernhard RonacherBehavioural Physiology Group, Department of Biology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Berlin, Germany.
Martin P NawrotBernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acoustic communication plays a key role for mate attraction in grasshoppers. Males use songs to advertise themselves to females. Females evaluate the song pattern, a repetitive structure of sound syllables separated by short pauses, to recognize a conspecific male and as proxy to its fitness. In their natural habitat females often receive songs with degraded temporal structure. Perturbations may, for example, result from the overlap with other songs. We studied the response behavior of females to songs that show different signal degradations. A perturbation of an otherwise attractive song at later positions in the syllable diminished the behavioral response, whereas the same perturbation at the onset of a syllable did not affect song attractiveness. We applied naïve Bayes classifiers to the spike trains of identified neurons in the auditory pathway to explore how sensory evidence about the acoustic stimulus and its attractiveness is represented in the neuronal responses. We find that populations of three or more neurons were sufficient to reliably decode the acoustic stimulus and to predict its behavioral relevance from the single-trial integrated firing rate. A simple model of decision making simulates the female response behavior. It computes for each syllable the likelihood for the presence of an attractive song pattern as evidenced by the population firing rate. Integration across syllables allows the likelihood to reach a decision threshold and to elicit the behavioral response. The close match between model performance and animal behavior shows that a spike rate code is sufficient to enable song pattern recognition.

Indexed as

acoustic communicationdecision makingnaïve Bayes classifierneural information processingpattern recognitionpopulation coding

Identifiers

PMID25565983
PMCPMC4271601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.