Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25565972›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neural circuits2014

Activity-dependent modulation of inhibitory synaptic kinetics in the cochlear nucleus.

Jana Nerlich, Christian Keine, Rudolf Rübsamen, R Michael Burger, Ivan Milenkovic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neural circuits, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Editorial: Inhibitory function in auditory processing.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2015
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jana NerlichDepartment of Neurobiology, Faculty of Biosciences, Pharmacy and Psychology, University of Leipzig Leipzig, Germany.
Christian KeineDepartment of Neurobiology, Faculty of Biosciences, Pharmacy and Psychology, University of Leipzig Leipzig, Germany.
Rudolf RübsamenDepartment of Neurobiology, Faculty of Biosciences, Pharmacy and Psychology, University of Leipzig Leipzig, Germany.
R Michael BurgerDepartment of Biological Sciences, Lehigh University Bethlehem, PA, USA.
Ivan MilenkovicDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Carl Ludwig Institute for Physiology, University of Leipzig Leipzig, Germany.

Funding

Efferent inhibitory mechanisms in binaural processingR01DC008989 · NIDCD · LEHIGH UNIVERSITY · PI BURGER, R. MICHAEL · 2009 to 2013
$1.8M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC008989NIDCD NIH HHS R01-DC008989
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spherical bushy cells (SBCs) in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus respond to acoustic stimulation with discharges that precisely encode the phase of low-frequency sound. The accuracy of spiking is crucial for sound localization and speech perception. Compared to the auditory nerve input, temporal precision of SBC spiking is improved through the engagement of acoustically evoked inhibition. Recently, the inhibition was shown to be less precise than previously understood. It shifts from predominantly glycinergic to synergistic GABA/glycine transmission in an activity-dependent manner. Concurrently, the inhibition attains a tonic character through temporal summation. The present study provides a comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms underlying this slow inhibitory input. We performed whole-cell voltage clamp recordings on SBCs from juvenile Mongolian gerbils and recorded evoked inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs) at physiological rates. The data reveal activity-dependent IPSC kinetics, i.e., the decay is slowed with increased input rates or recruitment. Lowering the release probability yielded faster decay kinetics of the single- and short train-IPSCs at 100 Hz, suggesting that transmitter quantity plays an important role in controlling the decay. Slow transmitter clearance from the synaptic cleft caused prolonged receptor binding and, in the case of glycine, spillover to nearby synapses. The GABAergic component prolonged the decay by contributing to the asynchronous vesicle release depending on the input rate. Hence, the different factors controlling the amount of transmitters in the synapse jointly slow the inhibition during physiologically relevant activity. Taken together, the slow time course is predominantly determined by the receptor kinetics and transmitter clearance during short stimuli, whereas long duration or high frequency stimulation additionally engage asynchronous release to prolong IPSCs.

Indexed as

AnimalsCochlear NucleusElectric Stimulationgamma-Aminobutyric AcidGerbillinaeGlycineInhibitory Postsynaptic PotentialsPatch-Clamp TechniquesSynapsesSynaptic TransmissionTissue Culture Techniquesgamma-Aminobutyric AcidGlycineactivity-dependent decayasynchronous releasecochlear nucleusinhibitionintersynaptic poolingre-uptakespherical bushy cell

Identifiers

PMID25565972
PMCPMC4274880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.