Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25565898›Full record

ArticleHIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.)2015

Potential barriers to rapid testing for human immunodeficiency virus among a commuter population in Johannesburg, South Africa.

Ndumiso Tshuma, Keith Muloongo, Geoffrey Setswe, Lucy Chimoyi, Bismark Sarfo, Dina Burger, Peter S Nyasulu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Factors associated with high HIV-related stigma among commuter populations in Johannesburg, South Africa.SAHARA J : journal of Social Aspects of HIV/AIDS Research Alliance · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ndumiso TshumaCommunity AIDS Response, Norwood, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Keith MuloongoCommunity AIDS Response, Norwood, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Geoffrey SetsweHIV/AIDS, STI and TB (HAST) research program, Human Science Research Council (HSRC), Pretoria, South Africa.
Lucy ChimoyiWits Reproductive Health and HIV Research Institute (WHRI), Hillbrow, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Bismark SarfoDepartment of Epidemiology and Disease Control, School of Public Health University of Ghana, Legon-Accra, Ghana.
Dina BurgerThe Research Office, Monash South Africa, Ruimsig, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Peter S NyasuluSchool of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa ; School of Health Sciences, Monash University, Ruimsig, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to determine barriers to accessing human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) counseling and testing (HCT) services among a commuter population.

methodsA cross-sectional, venue-based intercept survey was conducted. Participants were recruited during a 2-day community campaign at the Noord Street taxi rank in Johannesburg, South Africa. Data were collected using a self-administered questionnaire loaded onto an electronic data collection system and analyzed using Stata software. Factors contributing to barriers for HCT were modeled using multivariate logistic regression.

resultsA total of 1,146 (567 male and 579 female) individuals were interviewed; of these, 51.4% were females. The majority (59.5%) were aged 25-35 years. Significant factors were age group (15-19 years), marital status (married), educational level (high school), distance to the nearest clinic (>30 km), area of employment/residence (outside inner city), and number of sexual partners (more than one). Participants aged 15-19 years were more likely to report low-risk perception of HIV as a barrier to HCT (odds ratio [OR] 1.62; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-2.59), the married were more likely to report low-risk perception of HIV as a barrier to HCT (OR 1.49; 95% CI 1.13-1.96), and those living outside the inner city were more likely to report lack of partner support as a potential barrier (OR 1.94; 95% CI 1.34-2.80), while those with a high school education were more likely to report poor health worker attitude as a potential barrier to HIV testing (OR 2.17; 95% CI 1.36-3.45).

conclusionAge, marital status, occupation, educational level, area of employment and residence, distance to the nearest clinic, and number of sexual partners were factors significantly associated with barriers to HIV testing in the study population. Future HIV intervention targeting this population need to be reinforced in order to enhance HIV testing while taking cognizance of these factors.

Indexed as

accessibilitycommutercounselinghuman immunodeficiency viruspopulationtesting

Identifiers

PMID25565898
PMCPMC4284027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.