Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25565871›Full record

ArticleClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR2015

Cost-consequence analysis of long-term prophylaxis in the treatment of von Willebrand disease in the Italian context.

Piercarla Schinco, Dorina Cultrera, Federica Valeri, Alessandra Borchiellini, Michela Mantuano, Francesca Gorla, Alessia Savarese, Cristina Teruzzi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Cost of illness of urothelial bladder cancer in Italy.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Piercarla SchincoHemostasis and Thrombosis Unit, Molinette Hospital of Turin, Milan, Italy.
Dorina CultreraDepartment of Hematology, Hemophilia Regional Reference Center, University Hospital of Catania, Milan, Italy.
Federica ValeriHemostasis and Thrombosis Unit, Molinette Hospital of Turin, Milan, Italy.
Alessandra BorchielliniHemostasis and Thrombosis Unit, Molinette Hospital of Turin, Milan, Italy.
Michela MantuanoHEMAR-Health Economics, Market Access and Reimbursement, Temas-A Quintiles Company, Milan, Italy.
Francesca GorlaHEMAR-Health Economics, Market Access and Reimbursement, Temas-A Quintiles Company, Milan, Italy.
Alessia SavareseHEMAR-Health Economics, Market Access and Reimbursement, Temas-A Quintiles Company, Milan, Italy.
Cristina TeruzziHEMAR-Health Economics, Market Access and Reimbursement, Temas-A Quintiles Company, Milan, Italy.
Fondazione Ricerca Molinette · ITUniversity of Catania · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeProphylaxis with von Willebrand factor (VWF)/factor VIII (FVIII) concentrates is a potential approach for patients with severe von Willebrand disease (VWD). As far as we are aware, to date there have been no pharmacoeconomic analyses in order to assess the economic impact of treatments for severe VWD. The analysis presented here estimates the cost-benefit ratio of VWF with a low FVIII content when compared with VWF/FVIII concentrates currently used in Italy for long-term prophylaxis in patients with severe VWD.

methodsA cost-consequence analysis was undertaken to assess the economic impact of the treatment of severe VWD from the perspective both of the Italian National Health Service and society. The analysis was based on four case reports of long-term prophylaxis with VWD with VWF/FVIII concentrates and VWF with a low FVIII content. The costs per patient included direct and indirect costs for each treatment.

resultsConsidering the four case reports, health care costs (without cost of treatment) and indirect costs per patient per year were lower with VWF with a low FVIII content than VWF/FVIII concentrates. The total health care costs (without cost of treatment) and indirect costs avoided with VWF with a low FVIII content per patient per year ranged from €2,295 to €17,530 and from €1,867 to €4,978, respectively.

conclusionVWF with a low FVIII content seems to be a cost-effective treatment option for patients with severe VWD. Although the drug cost per se is higher, the use of VWF with a low FVIII content is associated with decreased consumption of hospital resources and fewer lost working days due to bleedings and consequently with an improvement of the quality of life of the patients.

Indexed as

costVWF/FVIII concentrateVWF with low FVIII content

Identifiers

PMID25565871
PMCPMC4274135
OpenAlexW2018583776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.