Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25565831›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine2014

Evaluation of silica nanoparticle toxicity after topical exposure for 90 days.

Hwa Jung Ryu, Nak-won Seong, Byoung Joon So, Heung-sik Seo, Jun-ho Kim, Jeong-Sup Hong, Myeong-kyu Park, Min-Seok Kim, Yu-Ri Kim, Kyu-Bong Cho and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nanomedicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Comment on Balwierz et al. Potential Carcinogens in Makeup Cosmetics.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Potential Carcinogens in Makeup Cosmetics.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Understanding the mechanisms of silica nanoparticles for nanomedicine.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2021
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Formulation of Tioconazole andMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Hwa Jung RyuDepartment of Dermatology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Nak-won SeongKorea Testing and Research Institute, Gyunggi-Do, South Korea.
Byoung Joon SoDepartment of Dermatology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Heung-sik SeoKorea Testing and Research Institute, Gyunggi-Do, South Korea.
Jun-ho KimKorea Testing and Research Institute, Gyunggi-Do, South Korea.
Jeong-Sup HongKorea Testing and Research Institute, Gyunggi-Do, South Korea.
Myeong-kyu ParkKorea Testing and Research Institute, Gyunggi-Do, South Korea.
Min-Seok KimKorea Testing and Research Institute, Gyunggi-Do, South Korea.
Yu-Ri KimDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Kyu-Bong ChoDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Science, Shinheung College, Uijeongbu, South Korea.
Mu Yeb SeoKorea Testing and Research Institute, Gyunggi-Do, South Korea.
Meyoung-Kon KimDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Eun Ho MaengKorea Testing and Research Institute, Gyunggi-Do, South Korea.
Sang Wook SonDepartment of Dermatology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Silica is a very common material that can be found in both crystalline and amorphous forms. Well-known toxicities of the lung can occur after exposure to the crystalline form of silica. However, the toxicities of the amorphous form of silica have not been thoroughly studied. The majority of in vivo studies of amorphous silica nanoparticles (NPs) were performed using an inhalation exposure method. Since silica NPs can be commonly administered through the skin, a study of dermal silica toxicity was necessary to determine any harmful effects from dermal exposures. The present study focused on the results of systemic toxicity after applying 20 nm colloidal silica NPs on rat skin for 90 days, in accordance with the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development test guideline 411 with a good laboratory practice system. Unlike the inhalation route or gastrointestinal route, the contact of silica NPs through skin did not result in any toxicity or any change in internal organs up to a dose of 2,000 mg/kg in rats.

Indexed as

NanoparticlesSilicon DioxideAdministration, CutaneousAnimalsEnvironmental ExposureRatsToxicity Tests, ChronicSilicon Dioxidedermal routesilica nanoparticlestoxicity

Identifiers

PMID25565831
PMCPMC4279761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.