Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25565821›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine2014

Organization of research team for nano-associated safety assessment in effort to study nanotoxicology of zinc oxide and silica nanoparticles.

Yu-Ri Kim, Sung Ha Park, Jong-Kwon Lee, Jayoung Jeong, Ja Hei Kim, Eun-Ho Meang, Tae Hyun Yoon, Seok Tae Lim, Jae-Min Oh, Seong Soo A An and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nanomedicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yu-Ri KimDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Korea University Medical School and College, Seoul, South Korea.
Sung Ha ParkDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
Jong-Kwon LeeToxicological Research Division, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Chungchungbuk-do, South Korea.
Jayoung JeongToxicological Research Division, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Chungchungbuk-do, South Korea.
Ja Hei KimConsumers Korea, Chongro-ku, Korea Testing and Research Institute, Seoul, South Korea.
Eun-Ho MeangGeneral toxicology team, Korea Testing and Research Institute, Seoul, South Korea.
Tae Hyun YoonLaboratory of Nanoscale Characterization and Environmental Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, College of Natural Sciences, Hanyang University, Seoul, South Korea.
Seok Tae LimDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Jellabuk-Do, South Korea.
Jae-Min OhDepartment of Chemistry and Medical Chemistry, College of Science and Technology, Yonsei University, Gangwon-do, South Korea.
Seong Soo A AnDepartment of Bionanotechnology, Gachon Medical Research Institute, Gachon University, Seongnam, South Korea.
Meyoung-Kon KimDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Korea University Medical School and College, Seoul, South Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, products made with nanomaterials are used widely, especially in biology, bio-technologies, and medical areas. However, limited investigations on potential toxicities of nanomaterials are available. Hence, diverse and systemic toxicological data with new methods for nanomaterials are needed. In order to investigate the nanotoxicology of nanoparticles (NPs), the Research Team for Nano-Associated Safety Assessment (RT-NASA) was organized in three parts and launched. Each part focused on different contents of research directions: investigators in part I were responsible for the efficient management and international cooperation on nano-safety studies; investigators in part II performed the toxicity evaluations on target organs such as assessment of genotoxicity, immunotoxicity, or skin penetration; and investigators in part III evaluated the toxicokinetics of NPs with newly developed techniques for toxicokinetic analyses and methods for estimating nanotoxicity. The RT-NASA study was carried out in six steps: need assessment, physicochemical property, toxicity evaluation, toxicokinetics, peer review, and risk communication. During the need assessment step, consumer responses were analyzed based on sex, age, education level, and household income. Different sizes of zinc oxide and silica NPs were purchased and coated with citrate, L-serine, and L-arginine in order to modify surface charges (eight different NPs), and each of the NPs were characterized by various techniques, for example, zeta potentials, scanning electron microscopy, and transmission electron microscopy. Evaluation of the "no observed adverse effect level" and systemic toxicities of all NPs were performed by thorough evaluation steps and the toxicokinetics step, which included in vivo studies with zinc oxide and silica NPs. A peer review committee was organized to evaluate and verify the reliability of toxicity tests, and the risk communication step was also needed to convey the current findings to academia, industry, and consumers. Several limitations were encountered in the RT-NASA project, and they are discussed for consideration for improvements in future studies.

Indexed as

NanotechnologyHumansNanoparticlesNeeds AssessmentSafetySilicon DioxideZinc OxideSilicon DioxideZinc Oxidenanomaterialsnanotoxicitypeer reviewphysicochemical propertytoxicokinetics

Identifiers

PMID25565821
PMCPMC4279765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.