Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25565779›Full record

ArticlePatient preference and adherence2015

Cancer survivors' perspectives and experience on western medicine and traditional Chinese medicine treatment and rehabilitation: a qualitative study.

Ji-Wei Wang, Zhi-Qi Yang, Cong Liu, Si-Jia Chen, Qian Shen, Tian-Rui Zhang, Nancy S Partike, Zheng-Ping Yuan, Jin-Ming Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ji-Wei WangSchool of Public Health, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Zhi-Qi YangSchool of Public Health, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Cong LiuSchool of Public Health, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Si-Jia ChenSchool of Public Health, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Qian ShenSchool of Public Health, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Tian-Rui ZhangSchool of Public Health, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Nancy S PartikeSchool of Public Health, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI, USA.
Zheng-Ping YuanShanghai Cancer Rehabilitation Club, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Jin-Ming YuSchool of Public Health, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the People's Republic of China, both western medicine (WM) and traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) are the main treatment and rehabilitation options for cancer patients. This study aimed to explore cancer survivors' perspectives and experience of treatment and rehabilitation, in order to promote patient-centered activities of treatment and rehabilitation.

methodsUsing a qualitative research approach, 68 cancer survivors were recruited from eight community cancer rehabilitation organizations in Shanghai, People's Republic of China. Eight focus group interviews were conducted. All these interviews were transcribed verbatim, and the data were analyzed by theme analysis.

resultsWM was the main choice in treatment phase though study participants noted more side effects. TCM was primarily used in the recovery phase. The lack of communication between doctors and cancer patients appears to affect treatment adherence and impair the doctor-patient relationship. WM was expensive for diagnostic procedures and treatment, while the cumulative costs of frequent use of TCM in the long rehabilitation period were also high. Both treatment options created significant perceived economic burden on patients. Conflicting information about dietary supplements tended to make cancer survivors confused.

conclusionImproving the communication between doctors and cancer patients helps to ameliorate cancer patient adherence and the effect of treatments. It is essential to educate cancer patients about the effect and cost of both WM and traditional TCM. Meanwhile, marketing management and guidance to consumers regarding use of dietary supplements in the cancer rehabilitation field are also necessary.

Indexed as

adherencecancer survivor educationfocus group interviewpreference

Identifiers

PMID25565779
PMCPMC4274133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.