Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25565662›Full record

ArticleEar and hearing

Hearing Impairment in Relation to Severity of Diabetes in a Veteran Cohort.

Dawn Konrad-Martin, Kelly M Reavis, Donald Austin, Nicholas Reed, Jane Gordon, Dan McDermott, Marilyn F Dille

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ear and hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Self-Reported Type 2 Diabetes and the Rate of Hearing Decline in Aging.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Hearing Care Within Diabetes Care: Strategies for Direct Inclusion.Clinical diabetes : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Predicting complications of diabetes mellitus using advanced machine learning algorithms.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Vascular and Neuroepithelial Histopathology of the Saccule in Humans With Diabetes Mellitus.Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Dawn Konrad-Martin1United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), Office of Rehabilitation Research and Development (RR&D) Services, National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, Portland, Oregon, USA; 2Department of Otolaryngology/HNS, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA; 3Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA; 4Department of Audiology, Speech-Language Pathology, and Deaf Studies, Towson University, Towson, Maryland, USA.
Kelly M Reavis
Donald Austin
Nicholas Reed
Jane Gordon
Dan McDermott
Marilyn F Dille
United States Department of Veterans Affairs · USRehabilitation Research and Development Service · USTowson University · US

Funding

Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Short-Term Institutional Research Training Grant (T35)T35DC008764 · NIDCD · PORTLAND VA RESEARCH FOUNDATION, INC. · PI DAWN L KONRAD-MARTIN · 2007 to 2026
$485k
Determinants of Word Recognition Speed in Older ListenersI01RX000301 · VA · PORTLAND VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI GALLUN, FREDERICK J., KONRAD-MARTIN, DAWN L · 2011 to 2014
–
Longitudinal Changes in Auditory Function Among Veterans with DiabetesI01RX000559 · VA · PORTLAND VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI DILLE, MARILYN F., KONRAD-MARTIN, DAWN L · 2012 to 2020
–
NIDCD NIH HHS T35 DC008764RRD VA I01 RX000301RRD VA I01 RX000559
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveType 2 diabetes is epidemic among veterans, approaching three times the prevalence of the general population. Diabetes leads to devastating complications of vascular and neurologic malfunction and appears to impair auditory function. Hearing loss prevention is a major health-related initiative in the Veterans Health Administration. Thus, this research sought to identify, and quantify with effect sizes, differences in hearing, speech recognition, and hearing-related quality of life (QOL) measures associated with diabetes and to determine whether well-controlled diabetes diminishes the differences.

designThe authors examined selected cross-sectional data from the baseline (initial) visit of a longitudinal study of Veterans with and without type 2 diabetes designed to assess the possible differences in age-related trajectories of peripheral and central auditory function between the two groups. In addition, the diabetes group was divided into subgroups on the basis of medical diagnosis of diabetes and current glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) as a metric of disease severity and control. Outcome measures were pure-tone thresholds, word recognition using sentences presented in noise or time-compressed, and an inventory assessing the self-perceived impact of hearing loss on QOL. Data were analyzed from 130 Veterans ages 24 to 73 (mean 48) years with well-controlled (controlled) diabetes, poorly controlled (uncontrolled) diabetes, prediabetes, and no diabetes. Regression was used to identify any group differences in age, noise exposure history, and other sociodemographic factors, and multiple regression was used to model each outcome variable, adjusting for potential confounders. Results were evaluated in relation to diabetes duration, use of insulin (yes, no), and presence of selected diabetes complications (neuropathy and retinopathy).

resultsCompared with nondiabetics, Veterans with uncontrolled diabetes had significant differences in hearing at speech frequencies, including poorer hearing by 3 to 3.5 dB for thresholds at 250 Hz and in a clinical pure-tone average, respectively. Compared with nondiabetic controls, individuals with uncontrolled diabetes also significantly more frequently reported that their hearing adversely impacted QOL on one of the three subscales (ability to adapt). Despite this, although they also had slightly poorer mean scores on both word recognition tasks performed, these differences did not reach statistical significance and all subjects performed well on these tasks. Compared with Veterans with controlled diabetes, those with uncontrolled disease tended to have had diabetes longer, be insulin-dependent, and have a greater prevalence of diabetic retinopathy. Results are generally comparable with the literature with regard to the magnitude of threshold differences and the prevalence of hearing impairment but extend prior work by providing threshold difference and hearing loss prevalence effect sizes by category of diabetes control and by including additional functional measures.

conclusionsIn a cohort of Veterans with type 2 diabetes and relatively good hearing, significant effects of disease severity were found for hearing thresholds at a subset of frequencies and for one of the three QOL subscales. Significant differences were concentrated among those with poorly controlled diabetes based on current HbA1c. Results provide evidence that the observed hearing dysfunction in type 2 diabetes might be prevented or delayed through tight metabolic control. Findings need to be corroborated using longitudinal assessments.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeSpeech PerceptionVeteransAdultAgedAudiometry, Pure-ToneCohort StudiesComorbidityCross-Sectional StudiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic NeuropathiesDiabetic RetinopathyFemaleGlycated HemoglobinHearing LossHearing TestsGlycated Hemoglobinhemoglobin A1c protein, human

Identifiers

PMID25565662
PMCPMC4632848
OpenAlexW2324970818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.