Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25565411›Full record

ArticleSmall (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)2015

Reversibly extracellular pH controlled cellular uptake and photothermal therapy by PEGylated mixed-charge gold nanostars.

Shouju Wang, Zhaogang Teng, Peng Huang, Dingbin Liu, Ying Liu, Ying Tian, Jing Sun, Yanjun Li, Huangxian Ju, Xiaoyuan Chen and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Seeing Better and Going Deeper in Cancer Nanotheranostics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Optically Active Nanomaterials for Bioimaging and Targeted Therapy.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2019
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Membrane heat shock protein 70: a theranostic target for cancer therapy.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Gold Nanotheranostics: Proof-of-Concept or Clinical Tool?Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Shouju WangDepartment of Medical Imaging, Jinling Hospital, School of Medicine, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210002, P.R. China; State Key Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry for Life Science, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210093, P.R. China.
Zhaogang Teng
Peng Huang
Dingbin Liu
Ying Liu
Ying Tian
Jing Sun
Yanjun Li
Huangxian Ju
Xiaoyuan Chen
Guangming Lu

Funding

Laboratory of Molecular Imaging and NanomedicineZIAEB000073 · NIBIB · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BIOMEDICAL IMAGING AND BIOENGINEERING · PI CHEN, XIAOYUAN · 2010 to 2020
$32.8M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 EB999999Intramural NIH HHS ZIA EB000073
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shielding nanoparticles from nonspecific interactions with normal cells/tissues before they reach and after they leave tumors is crucial for the selective delivery of NPs into tumor cells. By utilizing the reversible protonation of weak electrolytic groups to pH changes, long-chain amine/carboxyl-terminated polyethylene glycol (PEG) decorated gold nanostars (GNSs) are designed, exhibiting reversible, significant, and sensitive response in cell affinity and therapeutic efficacy to the extracellular pH (pHe) gradient between normal tissues and tumors. This smart nanosystem shows good dispersity and unimpaired photothermal efficacy in complex bioenvironment at pH 6.4 and 7.4 even when their surface charge is neutral. One PEGylated mixed-charge GNSs with certain surface composition, GNS-N/C 4, exhibits high cell affinity and therapeutic efficacy at pH 6.4, and low affinity and almost "zero" damage to cells at pH 7.4. Remarkably, this significant and sensitive response in cell affinity and therapeutic efficacy is reversible as local pH alternated. In vivo, GNS-N/C 4 shows higher accumulation in tumors and improved photothermal therapeutic efficacy than pH-insensitive GNSs. This newly developed smart nanosystem, whose cell affinity reversibly transforms in response to pHe gradient with unimpaired biostability, provides a novel effective means of tumor-selective therapy.

Indexed as

Cell MembraneCell SurvivalDelayed-Action PreparationsDiffusionExtracellular FluidGoldHeLa CellsHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationMaterials TestingMetal NanoparticlesNanocapsulesPhotochemotherapyPhotosensitizing AgentsPolyethylene GlycolsStatic ElectricityDelayed-Action PreparationsGoldNanocapsulesPhotosensitizing AgentsPolyethylene Glycolscontrollable cellular uptakePEGylated mixed-charge nanoparticlesphotothermal therapyreversibly pH responsivetumor-targeted delivery

Identifiers

PMID25565411
PMCPMC5227651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.