ArticleNature structural & molecular biology2015
Using synthetic RNAs as scaffolds and regulators.
Article in Nature structural & molecular biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- RNA splicing in health and disease.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
- Fine modulation of carbon flow in central carbon metabolism via ribosome-binding site modification inMetabolic engineering communications · 2026Article
- 3D RNA-scaffolded wireframe origami.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Unleashing the potential of catalytic RNAs to combat mis-spliced transcripts.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Review
- Length-Dependent Deep Learning Model for RNA Secondary Structure Prediction.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Learning the Fastest RNA Folding Path Based on Reinforcement Learning and Monte Carlo Tree Search.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- RNA origami design tools enable cotranscriptional folding of kilobase-sized nanoscaffolds.Nature chemistry · 2021Article
- Enzyme Assembly for Compartmentalized Metabolic Flux Control.Metabolites · 2020Review
- Scaling up genetic circuit design for cellular computing: advances and prospects.Natural computing · 2018Article
- Biomedical Applications of RNA-Based Devices.Current opinion in biomedical engineering · 2017Article
- Engineering nucleic acid structures for programmable molecular circuitry and intracellular biocomputation.Nature chemistry · 2017Review
- Targeted mutagenesis: A sniper-like diversity generator in microbial engineering.Synthetic and systems biotechnology · 2017Review
- Engineering the Bacterial Microcompartment Domain for Molecular Scaffolding Applications.Frontiers in microbiology · 2017Article
- Engineered transmembrane pores.Current opinion in chemical biology · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The natural versatility of RNA makes it an ideal substrate for bioengineering. Its structural properties and predictable base-pairing permit its use as molecular scaffold, and its ability to interact with nucleic acids, proteins and small molecules confers a regulatory potential that can be harvested to design RNA regulators in diverse contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25565027What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.