Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25564500›Full record

ArticleBrain : a journal of neurology2015

OPA1-related auditory neuropathy: site of lesion and outcome of cochlear implantation.

Rosamaria Santarelli, Roberta Rossi, Pietro Scimemi, Elona Cama, Maria Lucia Valentino, Chiara La Morgia, Leonardo Caporali, Rocco Liguori, Vincenzo Magnavita, Anna Monteleone and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cochlear implantation in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder: an updated systematic review.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Effect of Taking a Break From Cochlear-Implant Use for Resolving Facial-Nerve Stimulation: A Case Series.Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Cochlear Implantation Outcomes in Genotyped Subjects with Sensorineural Hearing Loss.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The human OPA1Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Red Flags in Primary Mitochondrial Diseases: What Should We Recognize?International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Rosamaria Santarelli1 Department of Neurosciences, University of Padova, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128 Padova, Italy 2 Audiology and Phoniatrics Service, Treviso Regional Hospital, Piazza Ospedale 1, 31100 Treviso, Italy rosamaria.santarelli@unipd.it.
Roberta Rossi1 Department of Neurosciences, University of Padova, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128 Padova, Italy 2 Audiology and Phoniatrics Service, Treviso Regional Hospital, Piazza Ospedale 1, 31100 Treviso, Italy.
Pietro Scimemi1 Department of Neurosciences, University of Padova, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128 Padova, Italy 2 Audiology and Phoniatrics Service, Treviso Regional Hospital, Piazza Ospedale 1, 31100 Treviso, Italy.
Elona Cama1 Department of Neurosciences, University of Padova, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128 Padova, Italy 2 Audiology and Phoniatrics Service, Treviso Regional Hospital, Piazza Ospedale 1, 31100 Treviso, Italy.
Maria Lucia Valentino3 Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), University of Bologna, Via Ugo Foscolo 7, 40123 Bologna, Italy 4 IRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences of Bologna, Bellaria Hospital, Via Altura 3, 40139 Bologna, Italy.
Chiara La Morgia3 Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), University of Bologna, Via Ugo Foscolo 7, 40123 Bologna, Italy 4 IRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences of Bologna, Bellaria Hospital, Via Altura 3, 40139 Bologna, Italy.
Leonardo Caporali3 Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), University of Bologna, Via Ugo Foscolo 7, 40123 Bologna, Italy 4 IRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences of Bologna, Bellaria Hospital, Via Altura 3, 40139 Bologna, Italy.
Rocco Liguori3 Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), University of Bologna, Via Ugo Foscolo 7, 40123 Bologna, Italy 4 IRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences of Bologna, Bellaria Hospital, Via Altura 3, 40139 Bologna, Italy.
Vincenzo Magnavita1 Department of Neurosciences, University of Padova, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128 Padova, Italy 2 Audiology and Phoniatrics Service, Treviso Regional Hospital, Piazza Ospedale 1, 31100 Treviso, Italy.
Anna Monteleone2 Audiology and Phoniatrics Service, Treviso Regional Hospital, Piazza Ospedale 1, 31100 Treviso, Italy.
Ariella Biscaro2 Audiology and Phoniatrics Service, Treviso Regional Hospital, Piazza Ospedale 1, 31100 Treviso, Italy.
Edoardo Arslan1 Department of Neurosciences, University of Padova, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128 Padova, Italy 2 Audiology and Phoniatrics Service, Treviso Regional Hospital, Piazza Ospedale 1, 31100 Treviso, Italy.
Valerio Carelli3 Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), University of Bologna, Via Ugo Foscolo 7, 40123 Bologna, Italy 4 IRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences of Bologna, Bellaria Hospital, Via Altura 3, 40139 Bologna, Italy.
Ca' Foncello Hospital · ITInstitute of Neurological Sciences · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

Telethon GGP06233
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hearing impairment is the second most prevalent clinical feature after optic atrophy in dominant optic atrophy associated with mutations in the OPA1 gene. In this study we characterized the hearing dysfunction in OPA1-linked disorders and provided effective rehabilitative options to improve speech perception. We studied two groups of OPA1 subjects, one comprising 11 patients (seven males; age range 13-79 years) carrying OPA1 mutations inducing haploinsufficiency, the other, 10 subjects (three males; age range 5-58 years) carrying OPA1 missense mutations. Both groups underwent audiometric assessment with pure tone and speech perception evaluation, and otoacoustic emissions and auditory brainstem response recording. Cochlear potentials were recorded through transtympanic electrocochleography from the group of patients harbouring OPA1 missense mutations and were compared to recordings obtained from 20 control subjects with normal hearing and from 19 subjects with cochlear hearing loss. Eight patients carrying OPA1 missense mutations underwent cochlear implantation. Speech perception measures and electrically-evoked auditory nerve and brainstem responses were obtained after 1 year of cochlear implant use. Nine of 11 patients carrying OPA1 mutations inducing haploinsufficiency had normal hearing function. In contrast, all but one subject harbouring OPA1 missense mutations displayed impaired speech perception, abnormal brainstem responses and presence of otoacoustic emissions consistent with auditory neuropathy. In electrocochleography recordings, cochlear microphonic had enhanced amplitudes while summating potential showed normal latency and peak amplitude consistent with preservation of both outer and inner hair cell activities. After cancelling the cochlear microphonic, the synchronized neural response seen in both normally-hearing controls and subjects with cochlear hearing loss was replaced by a prolonged, low-amplitude negative potential that decreased in both amplitude and duration during rapid stimulation consistent with neural generation. The use of cochlear implant improved speech perception in all but one patient. Brainstem potentials were recorded in response to electrical stimulation in five of six subjects, whereas no compound action potential was evoked from the auditory nerve through the cochlear implant. These findings indicate that underlying the hearing impairment in patients carrying OPA1 missense mutations is a disordered synchrony in auditory nerve fibre activity resulting from neural degeneration affecting the terminal dendrites. Cochlear implantation improves speech perception and synchronous activation of auditory pathways by bypassing the site of lesion.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationHearing Loss, CentralAdolescentAdultAgedAnalysis of VarianceAudiometry, Evoked ResponseAuditory ThresholdChildChild, PreschoolEvoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain StemFemaleGTP PhosphohydrolasesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleGTP PhosphohydrolasesOPA1 protein, humanauditory neuropathycochlear implantselectrocochleographyOPA1-related hearing impairmentspeech perception

Identifiers

PMID25564500
PMCPMC4339771
OpenAlexW2092742986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.