Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25564417›Full record

ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2015

Clinical variables associated with treatment changes in Parkinson's disease: results from the longitudinal phase of the REASON study.

Giovanni Abbruzzese, Paolo Barone, Roberto Ceravolo, Giovanni Fabbrini, Patrizia Lessi, Alessandra Ori, Lucia Simoni, Michele Tinazzi, Angelo Antonini

Abstract readClinical Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Disease progression in Parkinson subtypes: the PPMI dataset.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Giovanni AbbruzzeseDINOGMI, Centro Parkinson, Università degli Studi di Genova, Largo Daneo 3, 16132, Genoa, Italy, giabbr@unige.it.
Paolo Barone
Roberto Ceravolo
Giovanni Fabbrini
Patrizia Lessi
Alessandra Ori
Lucia Simoni
Michele Tinazzi
Angelo Antonini
Medidata (United States) · USAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana · ITBoehringer Ingelheim (Italy) · ITIRCCS San Camillo Hospital · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Genoa · ITUniversity of Salerno · ITUniversity of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To assess over a period of 9 months in a sample of Italian Parkinson's disease (PD) patients reasons leading the neurologist to modify dopaminergic treatment and patients' causes of dissatisfaction with ongoing therapy. To evaluate the influence of disease severity on therapy persistence. A disease severity balanced sample of PD patients with stable anti-parkinsonian drugs (APD) treatment was enrolled and evaluated every 3 months. Patients requiring APD treatment modifications were discontinued from the study. The probability to modify APD treatment is greater for higher motor (UPDRS scores) and non-motor symptoms (NMSS score) severity. Both from neurologist's and patient's perspective, motor symptoms were the main determinants underlying APD treatment modifications. Non-motor symptoms were cause of dissatisfaction with ongoing APD treatment for 52 % of the patients, while only 36 % of the neurologists considered these as valid reasons for therapy change. REASON is the first study in PD patients that prospectively examined reasons driving APD treatment changes. Results show that the disease severity significantly increases the probability of APD treatment change. Patients attribute greater relevance than neurologists to non-motor symptoms as reason requiring treatment changes. This confirms that patient and neurologist perceptions only partially overlap.

Indexed as

AgedFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedParkinson DiseasePhysician's RoleSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID25564417
OpenAlexW2091159756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.