Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25564288›Full record

ArticleTobacco control2015

Emotional reaction facilitates the brain and behavioural impact of graphic cigarette warning labels in smokers.

An-Li Wang, Steven B Lowen, Daniel Romer, Mario Giorno, Daniel D Langleben

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco control, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Combining Inserts With Warning Labels on Cigarette Packs to Promote Smoking Cessation: A 2-Week Randomized Trial.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2024
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Cigarette Graphic Warning Labels Are Not Created Equal: They Can Increase or Decrease Smokers' Quit Intentions Relative to Text-Only Warnings.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2017
    Trial
  13. Potential Effectiveness of Pictorial Warning Labels That Feature the Images and Personal Details of Real People.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2017
    Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Adolescents' Responses to Pictorial Warnings on Their Parents' Cigarette Packs.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2016
    Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

An-Li WangAnnenberg Public Policy Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Steven B LowenDepartment of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Belmont, Massachusetts, USA.
Daniel RomerAnnenberg Public Policy Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Mario GiornoAnnenberg Public Policy Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Daniel D LanglebenAnnenberg Public Policy Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
University of Pennsylvania · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Brain and behavioral effects of graphic cigarette warning labelsR01DA036028 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LANGLEBEN, DANIEL D · 2013 to 2017
$2.9M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA036028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWarning labels on cigarette packages are an important venue for information about the hazards of smoking. The 2009 US Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act mandated replacing the current text-only labels with graphic warning labels. However, labels proposed by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) were challenged in court by the tobacco companies, who argued successfully that the proposed labels needlessly encroached on their right to free speech, in part because they included images of high emotional salience that indiscriminately frightened rather than informed consumers.

methodsWe used functional MRI to examine the effects of graphic warning labels' emotional salience on smokers' brain activity and cognition. Twenty-four smokers viewed a random sequence of blocks of graphic warning labels that have been rated high or low on an 'emotional reaction' scale in previous research.

resultsWe found that labels rated high on emotional reaction were better remembered, associated with reduction in the urge to smoke, and produced greater brain response in the amygdala, hippocampi, inferior frontal gyri and the insulae.

conclusionsRecognition memory and craving are, respectively, correlates of effectiveness of addiction-related public health communications and interventions, and amygdala activation facilitates the encoding of emotional memories. Thus, our results suggest that emotional reaction to graphic warning labels contributes to their public health impact and may be an integral part of the neural mechanisms underlying their effectiveness. Given the urgency of the debate about the constitutional risks and public health benefits of graphic warning labels, these preliminary findings warrant consideration while longitudinal clinical studies are underway.

Indexed as

Smoking PreventionTobacco ProductsAdultBrainCravingEmotionsFemaleFunctional NeuroimagingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePhotic StimulationProduct LabelingRecognition, PsychologySmokingYoung AdultAdvertising and PromotionLitigationPackaging and LabellingPreventionPublic policy

Identifiers

PMID25564288
PMCPMC4495960
OpenAlexW2121065536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.