Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25564202›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2015

Rhipicephalus microplus serine protease inhibitor family: annotation, expression and functional characterisation assessment.

Manuel Rodriguez-Valle, Tao Xu, Sebastian Kurscheid, Ala E Lew-Tabor

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Serpins in the Spotlight: Novel Bioinformatic Insights IntoBiochemistry research international · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022
    Article
  7. Serpins in Tick Physiology and Tick-Host Interaction.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
  8. International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Interactive Gene Expression BetweenFrontiers in physiology · 2021
    Article
  11. Iripin-3, a New Salivary Protein Isolated FromFrontiers in immunology · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Manuel Rodriguez-ValleThe University of Queensland, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture & Food Innovation, Queensland Biosciences Precinct, 306 Carmody Rd, St. Lucia Qld, 4072, Australia. m.rodriguezvalle@uq.edu.au.
Tao XuThe University of Queensland, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture & Food Innovation, Queensland Biosciences Precinct, 306 Carmody Rd, St. Lucia Qld, 4072, Australia. tao.xu@uqconnect.edu.au.
Sebastian KurscheidUniversity Hospital Lausanne, Lausanne, VD, Switzerland. sebastian.kurscheid@gmail.com.
Ala E Lew-TaborThe University of Queensland, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture & Food Innovation, Queensland Biosciences Precinct, 306 Carmody Rd, St. Lucia Qld, 4072, Australia. a.lewtabor@uq.edu.au.
The University of Queensland · AUUniversity of Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus evades the host's haemostatic system through a complex protein array secreted into tick saliva. Serine protease inhibitors (serpins) conform an important component of saliva which are represented by a large protease inhibitor family in Ixodidae. These secreted and non-secreted inhibitors modulate diverse and essential proteases involved in different physiological processes.

methodsThe identification of R. microplus serpin sequences was performed through a web-based bioinformatics environment called Yabi. The database search was conducted on BmiGi V1, BmiGi V2.1, five SSH libraries, Australian tick transcriptome libraries and RmiTR V1 using bioinformatics methods. Semi quantitative PCR was carried out using different adult tissues and tick development stages. The cDNA of four identified R. microplus serpins were cloned and expressed in Pichia pastoris in order to determine biological targets of these serpins utilising protease inhibition assays.

resultsA total of four out of twenty-two serpins identified in our analysis are new R. microplus serpins which were named as RmS-19 to RmS-22. The analyses of DNA and predicted amino acid sequences showed high conservation of the R. microplus serpin sequences. The expression data suggested ubiquitous expression of RmS except for RmS-6 and RmS-14 that were expressed only in nymphs and adult female ovaries, respectively. RmS-19, and -20 were expressed in all tissues samples analysed showing their important role in both parasitic and non-parasitic stages of R. microplus development. RmS-21 was not detected in ovaries and RmS-22 was not identified in ovary and nymph samples but were expressed in the rest of the samples analysed. A total of four expressed recombinant serpins showed protease specific inhibition for Chymotrypsin (RmS-1 and RmS-6), Chymotrypsin / Elastase (RmS-3) and Thrombin (RmS-15).

conclusionThis study constitutes an important contribution and improvement to the knowledge about the physiologic role of R. microplus serpins during the host-tick interaction.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsBase SequenceCloning, MolecularDNAFemaleGene Expression RegulationNymphOvaryPeptide HydrolasesRhipicephalusSalivaSerine Proteinase InhibitorsDNAPeptide HydrolasesSerine Proteinase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID25564202
PMCPMC4322644
OpenAlexW2112605752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.