Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25563968›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental botany2015

Plant defence responses in oilseed rape MINELESS plants after attack by the cabbage moth Mamestra brassicae.

Ishita Ahuja, Nicole Marie van Dam, Per Winge, Marianne Trælnes, Aysel Heydarova, Jens Rohloff, Mette Langaas, Atle Magnar Bones

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental botany, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Perspectives for integrated insect pest protection in oilseed rape breeding.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Mechanisms of plant-insect interaction.Journal of experimental botany · 2015
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Ishita AhujaDepartment of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway.
Nicole Marie van DamGerman Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Deutscher Platz 5e, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany; Institute of Ecology, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Dornburger-Str. 159, 07743 Jena, Germany; Molecular Interaction Ecology, Institute of Water and Wetland Research (IWWR), Radboud University Nijmegen, PO Box 9010, 6500 GL Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Per WingeDepartment of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway.
Marianne TrælnesDepartment of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway.
Aysel HeydarovaDepartment of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway.
Jens RohloffDepartment of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway.
Mette LangaasDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway.
Atle Magnar BonesDepartment of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway atle.m.bones@ntnu.no.
Norwegian University of Science and Technology · NOGerman Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Brassicaceae family is characterized by a unique defence mechanism known as the 'glucosinolate-myrosinase' system. When insect herbivores attack plant tissues, glucosinolates are hydrolysed by the enzyme myrosinase (EC 3.2.1.147) into a variety of degradation products, which can deter further herbivory. This process has been described as 'the mustard oil bomb'. Additionally, insect damage induces the production of glucosinolates, myrosinase, and other defences. Brassica napus seeds have been genetically modified to remove myrosinase-containing myrosin cells. These plants are termed MINELESS because they lack myrosin cells, the so-called toxic mustard oil mines. Here, we examined the interaction between B. napus wild-type and MINELESS plants and the larvae of the cabbage moth Mamestra brassicae. No-choice feeding experiments showed that M. brassicae larvae gained less weight and showed stunted growth when feeding on MINELESS plants compared to feeding on wild-type plants. M. brassicae feeding didn't affect myrosinase activity in MINELESS plants, but did reduce it in wild-type seedlings. M. brassicae feeding increased the levels of indol-3-yl-methyl, 1-methoxy-indol-3-yl-methyl, and total glucosinolates in both wild-type and MINELESS seedlings. M. brassicae feeding affected the levels of glucosinolate hydrolysis products in both wild-type and MINELESS plants. Transcriptional analysis showed that 494 and 159 genes were differentially regulated after M. brassicae feeding on wild-type and MINELESS seedlings, respectively. Taken together, the outcomes are very interesting in terms of analysing the role of myrosin cells and the glucosinolate-myrosinase defence system in response to a generalist cabbage moth, suggesting that similar studies with other generalist or specialist insect herbivores, including above- and below-ground herbivores, would be useful.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrassica napusCyclopentanesGene Expression Regulation, PlantGenes, PlantGlucosinolatesGlycoside HydrolasesHerbivoryHydrolysisLarvaMothsMutationOxylipinsPlant DiseasesReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionReproducibility of ResultsCyclopentanesGlucosinolatesGlycoside Hydrolasesjasmonic acidOxylipinsthioglucosidaseTryptophanBrassica napus (oilseed rape)defence cellsgeneralistglucosinolatejasmonatesmyrosinaseplant–insect interactiontranscriptional profiling.

Identifiers

PMID25563968
PMCPMC4286410
OpenAlexW2130016048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.