ArticleNederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde2015
[The pros and cons of angioplasty in stable coronary artery disease].
Article in Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
American research demonstrated that 1 out of 4 patients undergoes diagnostic coronary angiography without clear evidence of symptoms or objective signs of ischaemia, leading to unnecessary angioplasties in a substantial number of patients. A second study, published simultaneously, demonstrated that proper patient education could decrease the rates of angioplasty in patients with stable coronary artery disease significantly. In the present editorial we critically assess both publications and put them in perspective to current clinical practice in the Netherlands along with the European guidelines for myocardial revascularization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25563787W197556148What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.