Corrigendum. Dietary magnesium intake is inversely associated with serum C-reactive protein levels: meta-analysis and systematic review.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Association between magnesium depletion score and prevalence of hyperuricemia in American adults: a study based on NHANES 2007-2018.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025
   Article
2. Nutrition-Based Management of Inflammaging in CKD and Renal Replacement Therapies.Nutrients · 2021
   Review
3. Malnutrition, Inflammation, Atherosclerosis Syndrome (MIA) and Diet Recommendations among End-Stage Renal Disease Patients Treated with Maintenance Hemodialysis.Nutrients · 2018
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Erratum for
  Dietary magnesium intake is inversely associated with serum C-reactive protein levels: meta-analysis and systematic review.2014

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract