Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25563497›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2015

Experimental tests of hypotheses for microsaccade generation.

Fatema F Ghasia, Aasef G Shaikh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Fixational eye movements in Tourette syndrome.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fatema F GhasiaCole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Aasef G Shaikh

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fixational eye movements such as microsaccades are important to prevent fading. These miniature eye movements are also necessary to redirect gaze to the target after a drift. Generation of saccades and microsaccades utilizes common neural substrates. We, therefore, hypothesized that physiological modulators of saccades should also affect microsaccades. Test of this hypothesis will also provide support for the models of a microsaccade generation. We performed two experiments. In the first experiment, complete darkness led to a decrease in the frequency and velocity, but increased the amplitude of microsaccades. In the second experiment, active eyelid closure further reduced the velocity and frequency of microsaccades, but increased their amplitude. Darkness reduces the superior colliculus activity leading to a reduction in the velocity and frequency of microsaccades. Eye closure might cause sustained inhibition of the omnipause neurons. Subsequent disinhibition of the burst neurons might cause a reduction in the post-inhibitory rebound firing resulting in a decreased velocity of microsaccades. Sustained inhibition of the omnipause neurons could also reduce the inhibitory drive that would otherwise abort microsaccades. Hence, by inhibiting the activity of omnipause neurons, the eye closure could increase the amplitude of microsaccades.

Indexed as

Ocular Physiological PhenomenaAdultAgedAnalysis of VarianceDarknessElectrooculographyEyeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReflex, Vestibulo-OcularSaccadesTime Factors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.