ArticleExperimental brain research2015
Experimental tests of hypotheses for microsaccade generation.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Visually Guided Saccades in Amblyopia and Strabismus: The Roles of Sensory Deficits and Nystagmus.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Objective assessment of eye alignment and disparity-driven vergence in Parkinson's disease.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2023Article
- Reduced fixation stability induced by peripheral viewing does not contribute to crowding.Journal of vision · 2020Article
- Effects of visual blur on microsaccades during visual exploration.Journal of eye movement research · 2019Article
- Fixational eye movements in Tourette syndrome.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fixational eye movements such as microsaccades are important to prevent fading. These miniature eye movements are also necessary to redirect gaze to the target after a drift. Generation of saccades and microsaccades utilizes common neural substrates. We, therefore, hypothesized that physiological modulators of saccades should also affect microsaccades. Test of this hypothesis will also provide support for the models of a microsaccade generation. We performed two experiments. In the first experiment, complete darkness led to a decrease in the frequency and velocity, but increased the amplitude of microsaccades. In the second experiment, active eyelid closure further reduced the velocity and frequency of microsaccades, but increased their amplitude. Darkness reduces the superior colliculus activity leading to a reduction in the velocity and frequency of microsaccades. Eye closure might cause sustained inhibition of the omnipause neurons. Subsequent disinhibition of the burst neurons might cause a reduction in the post-inhibitory rebound firing resulting in a decreased velocity of microsaccades. Sustained inhibition of the omnipause neurons could also reduce the inhibitory drive that would otherwise abort microsaccades. Hence, by inhibiting the activity of omnipause neurons, the eye closure could increase the amplitude of microsaccades.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25563497What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.