ArticleBMC medical research methodology2015
Maximising response from GPs to questionnaire surveys: do length or incentives make a difference?
Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Training general practitioners contributes to the identification of palliative patients and to multidimensional care provision: secondary outcomes of an RCT.BMJ supportive & palliative care · 2019Trial
- Allowing Physicians to Choose the Value of Compensation for Participation in a Web-Based Survey: Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2015Trial
- Self-perceived learning outcomes of academic detailing discussing rational therapy with proton pump inhibitors among general practitioners in Norway.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2026Article
- [ZApprO versus ZÄPrO: results of a first comparative study].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2023Article
- Article
- Short Versions of the Arabic Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetics Questionnaire for Yemeni Adolescents: Cross-Sectional Derivation and Validation.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Measuring care coordination in German primary care - adaptation and psychometric properties of the Medical Home Care Coordination Survey.BMC health services research · 2021Article
- Psychological assessments by manual physiotherapists in the Netherlands in patients with nonspecific low back pain.The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy · 2021Article
- Risk literacy assessment of general practitioners and medical students using the Berlin Numeracy Test.BMC family practice · 2020Article
- Willingness of general dental practices in South East London to engage with research.Primary health care research & development · 2019Article
- Clinicians' use of breast cancer risk assessment tools according to their perceived importance of breast cancer risk factors: an international survey.Journal of community genetics · 2019Article
- Improving women's knowledge about prenatal screening in the era of non-invasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome - development and acceptability of a low literacy decision aid.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2018Article
- Knowledge of features of inflammatory back pain in primary care in the West Midlands: a cross-sectional survey in the United Kingdom.Rheumatology international · 2018Article
- Which work-related characteristics are most strongly associated with common mental disorders? A cross-sectional study.BMJ open · 2018Article
- Use of the BOADICEA Web Application in clinical practice: appraisals by clinicians from various countries.Familial cancer · 2018Article
- Article
- German general practitioners' self-reported management of patients with chronic depression.BMC psychiatry · 2017Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGeneral Practitioners (GPs) respond poorly to postal surveys. Consequently there is potential for reduced data quality and bias in the findings. In general population surveys, response to postal questionnaires may be improved by reducing their length and offering incentives. The aim of this study was to investigate whether questionnaire length and/or the offer of an incentive improves the response of GPs to a postal questionnaire survey.
methodsA postal questionnaire survey was sent to 800 UK GPs randomly selected from Binley's database; a database containing contact details of professionals working in UK general practices. The random sample of GPs was assigned to one of four groups of 200, each receiving a different questionnaire, either a standard (eight sides of A4) or an abbreviated (four sides of A4) questionnaire, with or without the offer of an incentive (a prize draw entry for a £100 voucher) for completion. The effects of questionnaire length and offer of incentive on response were calculated.
resultsOf 800 mailed questionnaires, 19 GPs did not meet inclusion criteria and 172 (adjusted response 22.0%) completed questionnaires were received. Among the four groups, response ranged from 20.1% (standard questionnaire with no incentive and abbreviated questionnaire with incentive) through 21.8% (standard questionnaire with incentive), to 26.0% (abbreviated questionnaire with no incentive). There were no significant differences in response between the four groups (p = 0.447), between the groups receiving the standard versus the abbreviated questionnaire (% difference -2.1% (95% confidence interval (CI) -7.9, 3.7)) or the groups offered an incentive versus no incentive (% difference -2.1% (95% CI -7.9, 3.7).
conclusionsStrategies known to improve response to postal questionnaire surveys in the general population do not significantly improve the response to postal questionnaire surveys among GPs. Further refinements to these strategies, or more novel strategies, aimed at increasing response specifically among GPs need to be identified in order to maximise data quality and generalisability of research results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.