Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25562728›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2013

Attitudes towards Social Networking and Sharing Behaviors among Consumers of Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genomics.

Sandra Soo-Jin Lee, Simone L Vernez, K E Ormond, Mark Granovetter

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Challenges of web-based personal genomic data sharing.Life sciences, society and policy · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sandra Soo-Jin LeeStanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, 1215 Welch Road, Mod A, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. sandra.lee@stanford.edu.
Simone L VernezIrvine School of Medicine, University of California, 1001 Health Sciences Road, 252 Irvine Hall, Irvine, CA 92697, USA. slvernez@gmail.com.
K E OrmondStanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, 1215 Welch Road, Mod A, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. kormond@stanford.edu.
Mark GranovetterDepartment of Sociology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. mgranovetter@stanford.edu.
Stanford University · USUniversity of California, Irvine · US

Funding

Center for Integration of Research on Genetics and EthicsP50HG003389 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CHO, MILDRED K. · 2004 to 2014
$9.9M
Social Networking and Personal Genomics: Emerging Issues for Health ResearchR01HG005086 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LEE, SANDRA SOO-JIN · 2010 to 2012
$918k
NHGRI NIH HHS P50 HG003389NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG005086
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledLittle is known about how consumers of direct-to-consumer personal genetic services share personal genetic risk information. In an age of ubiquitous online networking and rapid development of social networking tools, understanding how consumers share personal genetic risk assessments is critical in the development of appropriate and effective policies. This exploratory study investigates how consumers share personal genetic information and attitudes towards social networking behaviors.

methodsAdult participants aged 23 to 72 years old who purchased direct-to-consumer genetic testing from a personal genomics company were administered a web-based survey regarding their sharing activities and social networking behaviors related to their personal genetic test results.

results80 participants completed the survey; of those, 45% shared results on Facebook and 50.9% reported meeting or reconnecting with more than 10 other individuals through the sharing of their personal genetic information. For help interpreting test results, 70.4% turned to Internet websites and online sources, compared to 22.7% who consulted their healthcare providers. Amongst participants, 51.8% reported that they believe the privacy of their personal genetic information would be breached in the future.

conclusionConsumers actively utilize online social networking tools to help them share and interpret their personal genetic information. These findings suggest a need for careful consideration of policy recommendations in light of the current ambiguity of regulation and oversight of consumer initiated sharing activities.

Identifiers

PMID25562728
PMCPMC4251386
OpenAlexW1996751067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.