ArticlePLoS biology2015
A new framework for cortico-striatal plasticity: behavioural theory meets in vitro data at the reinforcement-action interface.
Article in PLoS biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 66 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
66 citing papers in PubMed, 140 citations in OpenAlex.
- Coordinated yet asymmetric striatal neuromodulatory dynamics encode associative learning.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- How cortico-basal ganglia-thalamic subnetworks can shift decision policies to increase reward rate.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Distinct dopaminergic spike-timing-dependent plasticity rules are suited to different functional roles.Research square · 2025Article
- Mechanisms and interventions promoting healthy frontostriatal dynamics in obsessive-compulsive disorder.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Distinct dopaminergic spike-timing-dependent plasticity rules are suited to different functional roles.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Reward expectation and receipt differentially modulate the spiking of accumbens D1+ and D2+ neurons.Current biology : CB · 2025Article
- Article
- CBGTPy: An extensible cortico-basal ganglia-thalamic framework for modeling biological decision making.PloS one · 2025Article
- Potential impacts of acupuncture on motor function recovery after ischemic stroke: insights from basic and clinical studies.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2025Review
- An ultra low frequency spike timing dependent plasticity based approach for reducing alcohol drinking.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- CBGTPy: An extensible cortico-basal ganglia-thalamic framework for modeling biological decision making.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- D2 dopamine receptor expression, reactivity to rewards, and reinforcement learning in a complex value-based decision-making task.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2024Article
- Anti-Hebbian plasticity drives sequence learning in striatum.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Sensory Reinforced Corticostriatal Plasticity.Current neuropharmacology · 2024Article
- Feasibility of dopamine as a vector-valued feedback signal in the basal ganglia.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Enhancing reinforcement learning models by including direct and indirect pathways improves performance on striatal dependent tasks.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Article
- Unraveling the dynamics of dopamine release and its actions on target cells.Trends in neurosciences · 2023Review
6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Operant learning requires that reinforcement signals interact with action representations at a suitable neural interface. Much evidence suggests that this occurs when phasic dopamine, acting as a reinforcement prediction error, gates plasticity at cortico-striatal synapses, and thereby changes the future likelihood of selecting the action(s) coded by striatal neurons. But this hypothesis faces serious challenges. First, cortico-striatal plasticity is inexplicably complex, depending on spike timing, dopamine level, and dopamine receptor type. Second, there is a credit assignment problem-action selection signals occur long before the consequent dopamine reinforcement signal. Third, the two types of striatal output neuron have apparently opposite effects on action selection. Whether these factors rule out the interface hypothesis and how they interact to produce reinforcement learning is unknown. We present a computational framework that addresses these challenges. We first predict the expected activity changes over an operant task for both types of action-coding striatal neuron, and show they co-operate to promote action selection in learning and compete to promote action suppression in extinction. Separately, we derive a complete model of dopamine and spike-timing dependent cortico-striatal plasticity from in vitro data. We then show this model produces the predicted activity changes necessary for learning and extinction in an operant task, a remarkable convergence of a bottom-up data-driven plasticity model with the top-down behavioural requirements of learning theory. Moreover, we show the complex dependencies of cortico-striatal plasticity are not only sufficient but necessary for learning and extinction. Validating the model, we show it can account for behavioural data describing extinction, renewal, and reacquisition, and replicate in vitro experimental data on cortico-striatal plasticity. By bridging the levels between the single synapse and behaviour, our model shows how striatum acts as the action-reinforcement interface.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.