Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25562435›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2015

Prognostic value of circulating tumour cells for early recurrence after resection of colorectal liver metastases.

Z S Lalmahomed, B Mostert, W Onstenk, J Kraan, N Ayez, J W Gratama, D Grünhagen, C Verhoef, S Sleijfer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Circulating tumor cells in colorectal cancer in the era of precision medicine.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Histopathological growth patterns and positive margins after resection of colorectal liver metastases.HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Z S LalmahomedDivision of Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, PO Box 2040, Erasmus MC, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
B MostertDepartment of Medical Oncology and Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, PO Box 5201, Erasmus MC, 3008 AE Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
W OnstenkDepartment of Medical Oncology and Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, PO Box 5201, Erasmus MC, 3008 AE Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
J KraanDepartment of Medical Oncology and Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, PO Box 5201, Erasmus MC, 3008 AE Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
N AyezDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, PO Box 5201, Erasmus MC, 3008 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
J W GratamaDepartment of Medical Oncology and Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, PO Box 5201, Erasmus MC, 3008 AE Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
D GrünhagenDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, PO Box 5201, Erasmus MC, 3008 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
C VerhoefDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, PO Box 5201, Erasmus MC, 3008 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
S SleijferDepartment of Medical Oncology and Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, PO Box 5201, Erasmus MC, 3008 AE Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite good outcomes for many, a substantial group of patients undergoing metastasectomy for isolated liver metastases from colorectal cancer (CRC) experience early recurrence. We have investigated whether circulating tumour cell (CTC) detection can identify patients developing disease recurrence within 1 year after liver metastasectomy.

methodsIn CRC patients undergoing liver metastasectomy, 30 ml peripheral blood was withdrawn preoperatively. CTCs were detected by the CellSearch system after a density-gradient-based enrichment step.

resultsOne hundred and seventy-three samples from 151 individual patients were analysed. In 75 samples (43%), CTCs were detected, 16% had ⩾3 CTCs/7.5 ml of blood. Eighty-two patients (47%) experienced early disease recurrence (<1 year). The 1-year recurrence rate between patients with or without detectable CTCs were similar (47% vs 48%) or with a low or high CTC count (<3 or ⩾3 CTCs/7.5 ml of blood) (50% vs 47%). Also disease-free and overall survival were similar between patients with or without CTCs.

conclusionsThe presence of CTCs in preoperative peripheral blood samples does not identify patients at risk for early disease recurrence after curative resection of colorectal liver metastases. Other parameters are needed to better identify patients at high risk to relapse after liver metastasectomy for CRC.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCell SeparationColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHepatectomyHumansLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID25562435
PMCPMC4453661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.