Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25561814›Full record

Observational studyWorld journal of gastroenterology2014

Assessment of the relationship between resilience and quality of life in patients with digestive cancer.

Jun Tian, Jin-Sheng Hong

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in World journal of gastroenterology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03905876 (Psychological Experience of the End of the Treatment During a Clincal Trial of the Early Phase and Role of the Initial prédispositions), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03905876 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Psychological Experience of the End of the Treatment During a Clincal Trial of the Early Phase and Role of the Initial prédispositions ( VRAIMENT)

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'AurelleRan2019 to 2024Enrolled182ConditionsPsychological Distress, CancerArmsQuestionnaire
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Distinct dyadic quality of life profiles among patient-caregiver dyads with advanced lung cancer: a latent profile analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Resilience: an essential element in head and neck cancer survivorship and quality of life.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Resilience is strongly associated with health-related quality of life but does not buffer work-related stress in employed persons 1 year after acute myocardial infarction.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Observational
  17. Resilience and Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Patients.Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences · 2015
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jun TianJun Tian, Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350004, Fujian Province, China.
Jin-Sheng HongJun Tian, Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350004, Fujian Province, China.
Fujian Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo study the relationship between resilience and quality of life (QOL) in patients with digestive cancer.

methodsThe resilience of patients was measured prior to treatment, and their psychological distress, fatigue status, and treatment side effects were assessed 3 wk after. Their QOL was measured after their treatment ended. A relationship model of these variables was constructed using path analysis.

resultsResilience explained 33.2% of the variance in psychological distress, 16.1% of the variance in fatigue, and 1.23% of the variance in side effects. The relationship between resilience and QOL was statistically significant (β = 0.119, t = 4.499, P < 0.001) when psychological distress, fatigue, and side effects were absent from the regression model, whereas the adjusted regression coefficient of resilience was not statistically significant (t = 1.562, P > 0.05) when these variables were added. Psychological distress, together with fatigue and side effects, could explain 52.40% of the variance in QOL (P < 0.05). Physiological distress accounted for 28.94% of the total effect on QOL, fatigue accounted for 33.72%, side effects accounted for 22.53%, and resilience accounted for 14.80%.

conclusionResilience is not an independent predictor of QOL in patients with digestive cancer, but it is a main factor influencing psychological distress and side effects.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeResilience, PsychologicalAdultAgedChinaCost of IllnessDigestive System NeoplasmsFatigueFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsStress, PsychologicalSurveys and QuestionnairesTime FactorsDigestive cancerFatiguePath analysisPsychological distressQuality of lifeResilience

Identifiers

PMID25561814
PMCPMC4277984
OpenAlexW1999451183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.