Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25561790›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2014

Intravenous vs intraperitoneal mesenchymal stem cells administration: what is the best route for treating experimental colitis?

Fabiany da Costa Gonçalves, Natália Schneider, Fernanda Otesbelgue Pinto, Fabíola Schons Meyer, Fernanda Visioli, Bianca Pfaffenseller, Patrícia Luciana da Costa Lopez, Eduardo Pandolfi Passos, Elizabeth Obino Cirne-Lima, Luíse Meurer and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. METTL3 loss exacerbates colitis via mActa pharmacologica Sinica · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. CD126Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fabiany da Costa GonçalvesFabiany da Costa Gonçalves, Natália Schneider, Fernanda Otesbelgue Pinto, Fabíola Schons Meyer, Bianca Pfaffenseller, Eduardo Pandolfi Passos, Elizabeth Obino Cirne-Lima, Ana Helena Paz, Centro de Pesquisa Experimental do Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre 90035-903, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Natália SchneiderFabiany da Costa Gonçalves, Natália Schneider, Fernanda Otesbelgue Pinto, Fabíola Schons Meyer, Bianca Pfaffenseller, Eduardo Pandolfi Passos, Elizabeth Obino Cirne-Lima, Ana Helena Paz, Centro de Pesquisa Experimental do Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre 90035-903, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Fernanda Otesbelgue PintoFabiany da Costa Gonçalves, Natália Schneider, Fernanda Otesbelgue Pinto, Fabíola Schons Meyer, Bianca Pfaffenseller, Eduardo Pandolfi Passos, Elizabeth Obino Cirne-Lima, Ana Helena Paz, Centro de Pesquisa Experimental do Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre 90035-903, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Fabíola Schons MeyerFabiany da Costa Gonçalves, Natália Schneider, Fernanda Otesbelgue Pinto, Fabíola Schons Meyer, Bianca Pfaffenseller, Eduardo Pandolfi Passos, Elizabeth Obino Cirne-Lima, Ana Helena Paz, Centro de Pesquisa Experimental do Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre 90035-903, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Fernanda VisioliFabiany da Costa Gonçalves, Natália Schneider, Fernanda Otesbelgue Pinto, Fabíola Schons Meyer, Bianca Pfaffenseller, Eduardo Pandolfi Passos, Elizabeth Obino Cirne-Lima, Ana Helena Paz, Centro de Pesquisa Experimental do Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre 90035-903, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Bianca PfaffensellerFabiany da Costa Gonçalves, Natália Schneider, Fernanda Otesbelgue Pinto, Fabíola Schons Meyer, Bianca Pfaffenseller, Eduardo Pandolfi Passos, Elizabeth Obino Cirne-Lima, Ana Helena Paz, Centro de Pesquisa Experimental do Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre 90035-903, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Patrícia Luciana da Costa LopezFabiany da Costa Gonçalves, Natália Schneider, Fernanda Otesbelgue Pinto, Fabíola Schons Meyer, Bianca Pfaffenseller, Eduardo Pandolfi Passos, Elizabeth Obino Cirne-Lima, Ana Helena Paz, Centro de Pesquisa Experimental do Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre 90035-903, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Eduardo Pandolfi PassosFabiany da Costa Gonçalves, Natália Schneider, Fernanda Otesbelgue Pinto, Fabíola Schons Meyer, Bianca Pfaffenseller, Eduardo Pandolfi Passos, Elizabeth Obino Cirne-Lima, Ana Helena Paz, Centro de Pesquisa Experimental do Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre 90035-903, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Elizabeth Obino Cirne-LimaFabiany da Costa Gonçalves, Natália Schneider, Fernanda Otesbelgue Pinto, Fabíola Schons Meyer, Bianca Pfaffenseller, Eduardo Pandolfi Passos, Elizabeth Obino Cirne-Lima, Ana Helena Paz, Centro de Pesquisa Experimental do Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre 90035-903, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Luíse MeurerFabiany da Costa Gonçalves, Natália Schneider, Fernanda Otesbelgue Pinto, Fabíola Schons Meyer, Bianca Pfaffenseller, Eduardo Pandolfi Passos, Elizabeth Obino Cirne-Lima, Ana Helena Paz, Centro de Pesquisa Experimental do Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre 90035-903, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Ana Helena PazFabiany da Costa Gonçalves, Natália Schneider, Fernanda Otesbelgue Pinto, Fabíola Schons Meyer, Bianca Pfaffenseller, Eduardo Pandolfi Passos, Elizabeth Obino Cirne-Lima, Ana Helena Paz, Centro de Pesquisa Experimental do Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre 90035-903, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo investigate the therapeutic effects of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) transplanted intraperitoneally and intravenously in a murine model of colitis.

methodsMSCs were isolated from C57BL/6 mouse adipose tissue. MSC cultures were analyzed according to morphology, cellular differentiation potential, and surface molecular markers. Experimental acute colitis was induced in C57BL/6 mice by oral administration of 2% dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) in drinking water ad libitum from days 0 to 7. Colitis mice were treated with 1 × 10(6) MSCs via intraperitoneal or intravenous injection on days 2 and 5. The disease activity index was determined daily based on the following parameters: weight loss, stool consistency and presence of blood in the feces and anus. To compare morphological and functional differences in tissue regeneration between different MSC injection modalities, mice were euthanized on day 8, and their colons were examined for length, weight, and histopathological changes. Inflammatory responses were determined by measuring the levels of different serum cytokines using a CBA Th1/Th2/Th17 kit. Apoptotic rates were evaluated by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUDP-biotin nick end labeling assay.

resultsIntravenous infusion of MSCs was more effective than intraperitoneal treatment (P < 0.001) in reducing the clinical and histopathologic severity of colitis, which includes weight loss, diarrhea and inflammation. An histological evaluation demonstrated decreased colonic inflammation based on reduced crypt loss and reduced infiltration of inflammatory cells. This therapeutic effect was most likely mediated by the down-regulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines [interleukin (IL)-6 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)]; and by the up-regulation of anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-10 and IL-4). Intravenous transplantation also induced high levels of IFN that lead to activation of the immunosuppressive activity of the MSCs, which did not occur with intraperitoneal transplantation (P = 0.006). An increase in apoptotic T cells was observed after intravenous, but not intraperitoneal, MSC infusion, suggesting that MSCs can induce apoptosis in resistant T cells in colonic inflammation (P = 0.027).

conclusionOur results demonstrate that intravenous treatment is a superior method for reducing colon inflammation compared with intraperitoneal therapy.

Indexed as

RegenerationAcute DiseaseAnimalsApoptosisBiomarkersCells, CulturedColitisColonCytokinesDextran SulfateDisease Models, AnimalInflammation MediatorsInfusions, IntravenousInfusions, ParenteralMaleMesenchymal Stem CellsBiomarkersCytokinesDextran SulfateInflammation MediatorsCell transplantationDextran sulfate sodiumImmunomodulationInflammatory bowel diseaseIntravenous injectionMesenchymal stem cellUlcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID25561790
PMCPMC4277960
OpenAlexW177021741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.