Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25561678›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2015

Why and how might genetic and phylogenetic diversity be reflected in the identification of key biodiversity areas?

T M Brooks, A Cuttelod, D P Faith, J Garcia-Moreno, P Langhammer, S Pérez-Espona

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Phylogeny, extinction and conservation: embracing uncertainties in a time of urgency.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2015
    Article
  13. Phylogenetic diversity, functional trait diversity and extinction: avoiding tipping points and worst-case losses.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

T M BrooksIUCN, 28 rue Mauverney, Gland 1196, Switzerland t.brooks@iucn.org.
A CuttelodIUCN, 219c Huntingdon Road, Cambridge CB3 0DL, UK.
D P FaithAustralian Museum, 6 College St., Sydney, New South Wales 2010, Australia.
J Garcia-MorenoHet Haam 16, Arnhem 6846 KW, The Netherlands.
P LanghammerSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, PO Box 874601, Tempe, AZ 85287-4601, USA.
S Pérez-EsponaDepartment of Life Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, East Road, Cambridge CB1 1PT, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

'Key biodiversity areas' are defined as sites contributing significantly to the global persistence of biodiversity. The identification of these sites builds from existing approaches based on measures of species and ecosystem diversity and process. Here, we therefore build from the work of Sgró et al. (2011 Evol. Appl. 4, 326-337. (doi:10.1111/j.1752-4571.2010.00157.x)) to extend a framework for how components of genetic diversity might be considered in the identification of key biodiversity areas. We make three recommendations to inform the ongoing process of consolidating a key biodiversity areas standard: (i) thresholds for the threatened species criterion currently consider a site's share of a threatened species' population; expand these to include the proportion of the species' genetic diversity unique to a site; (ii) expand criterion for 'threatened species' to consider 'threatened taxa' and (iii) expand the centre of endemism criterion to identify as key biodiversity areas those sites holding a threshold proportion of the compositional or phylogenetic diversity of species (within a taxonomic group) whose restricted ranges collectively define a centre of endemism. We also recommend consideration of occurrence of EDGE species (i.e. threatened phylogenetic diversity) in key biodiversity areas to prioritize species-specific conservation actions among sites.

Indexed as

BiodiversityDecision Support TechniquesEcosystemEndangered SpeciesGenetic VariationPhylogenyConservation of Natural ResourcesDemographyModels, Theoreticaladaptive potentialevolutionary refugiagenetic diversitykey biodiversity areasphylogenetic diversity

Identifiers

PMID25561678
PMCPMC4290431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.