Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25561668›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2015

Phylogenetic diversity meets conservation policy: small areas are key to preserving eucalypt lineages.

Laura J Pollock, Dan F Rosauer, Andrew H Thornhill, Heini Kujala, Michael D Crisp, Joseph T Miller, Michael A McCarthy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Facets of phylodiversity: evolutionary diversification, divergence and survival as conservation targets.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Solving the master equation for Indels.BMC bioinformatics · 2017
    Article
  14. Phylogeny, extinction and conservation: embracing uncertainties in a time of urgency.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Laura J PollockSchool of Botany, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia laurajs@unimelb.edu.au.
Dan F RosauerResearch School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Andrew H ThornhillAustralian Tropical Herbarium, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, Australia Australian National Herbarium, CSIRO, Plant Industry, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Heini KujalaSchool of Botany, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Michael D CrispResearch School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Joseph T MillerAustralian National Herbarium, CSIRO, Plant Industry, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Michael A McCarthySchool of Botany, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evolutionary and genetic knowledge is increasingly being valued in conservation theory, but is rarely considered in conservation planning and policy. Here, we integrate phylogenetic diversity (PD) with spatial reserve prioritization to evaluate how well the existing reserve system in Victoria, Australia captures the evolutionary lineages of eucalypts, which dominate forest canopies across the state. Forty-three per cent of remaining native woody vegetation in Victoria is located in protected areas (mostly national parks) representing 48% of the extant PD found in the state. A modest expansion in protected areas of 5% (less than 1% of the state area) would increase protected PD by 33% over current levels. In a recent policy change, portions of the national parks were opened for development. These tourism development zones hold over half the PD found in national parks with some species and clades falling entirely outside of protected zones within the national parks. This approach of using PD in spatial prioritization could be extended to any clade or area that has spatial and phylogenetic data. Our results demonstrate the relevance of PD to regional conservation policy by highlighting that small but strategically located areas disproportionally impact the preservation of evolutionary lineages.

Indexed as

BiodiversityEcosystemPhylogenyConservation of Natural ResourcesEucalyptusPublic PolicySpecies SpecificityVictoriaAustraliaEucalyptusphylogenetic diversityreserve selectionspatial prioritizationspecies distribution modelling

Identifiers

PMID25561668
PMCPMC4290421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.