Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25561664›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2015

A practical guide to the application of the IUCN Red List of Ecosystems criteria.

Jon Paul Rodríguez, David A Keith, Kathryn M Rodríguez-Clark, Nicholas J Murray, Emily Nicholson, Tracey J Regan, Rebecca M Miller, Edmund G Barrow, Lucie M Bland, Kaia Boe and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Accounting for functionality in the identification of global conservation priorities: promises and pitfalls.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Effects of forest cover on richness of threatened fish species in Japan.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jon Paul RodríguezCentro de Ecología, Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas, Apdo. 20632, Caracas 1020-A, Venezuela Provita, Apdo. 47552, Caracas 1041-A, Venezuela IUCN Commission on Ecosystem Management, Rue Mauverney 28, 1196 Gland, Switzerland IUCN Species Survival Commission, Rue Mauverney 28, 1196 Gland, Switzerland jonpaul@ivic.gob.ve jonpaul.rodriguez@gmail.com.
David A KeithIUCN Commission on Ecosystem Management, Rue Mauverney 28, 1196 Gland, Switzerland IUCN Species Survival Commission, Rue Mauverney 28, 1196 Gland, Switzerland Centre for Ecosystem Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia New South Wales Office of Environment and Heritage, Hurstville, New South Wales, Australia.
Kathryn M Rodríguez-ClarkCentro de Ecología, Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas, Apdo. 20632, Caracas 1020-A, Venezuela.
Nicholas J MurrayCentre for Ecosystem Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia.
Emily NicholsonARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, School of Botany, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia.
Tracey J ReganARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, School of Botany, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia.
Rebecca M MillerIUCN, Rue Mauverney 28, 1196 Gland, Switzerland.
Edmund G BarrowIUCN, Rue Mauverney 28, 1196 Gland, Switzerland.
Lucie M BlandARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, School of Botany, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia.
Kaia BoeIUCN, Rue Mauverney 28, 1196 Gland, Switzerland.
Thomas M BrooksIUCN, Rue Mauverney 28, 1196 Gland, Switzerland.
María A Oliveira-MirandaProvita, Apdo. 47552, Caracas 1041-A, Venezuela.
Mark SpaldingThe Nature Conservancy and Conservation Science Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Piet WitIUCN Commission on Ecosystem Management, Rue Mauverney 28, 1196 Gland, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The newly developed IUCN Red List of Ecosystems is part of a growing toolbox for assessing risks to biodiversity, which addresses ecosystems and their functioning. The Red List of Ecosystems standard allows systematic assessment of all freshwater, marine, terrestrial and subterranean ecosystem types in terms of their global risk of collapse. In addition, the Red List of Ecosystems categories and criteria provide a technical base for assessments of ecosystem status at the regional, national, or subnational level. While the Red List of Ecosystems criteria were designed to be widely applicable by scientists and practitioners, guidelines are needed to ensure they are implemented in a standardized manner to reduce epistemic uncertainties and allow robust comparisons among ecosystems and over time. We review the intended application of the Red List of Ecosystems assessment process, summarize 'best-practice' methods for ecosystem assessments and outline approaches to ensure operational rigour of assessments. The Red List of Ecosystems will inform priority setting for ecosystem types worldwide, and strengthen capacity to report on progress towards the Aichi Targets of the Convention on Biological Diversity. When integrated with other IUCN knowledge products, such as the World Database of Protected Areas/Protected Planet, Key Biodiversity Areas and the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, the Red List of Ecosystems will contribute to providing the most complete global measure of the status of biodiversity yet achieved.

Indexed as

EcosystemModels, BiologicalClassificationConservation of Natural ResourcesEndangered SpeciesRisk Assessmentecosystem conservationecosystem risk assessmentecosystem typesIUCN Red List of Ecosystemsrisk of collapsethreatened ecosystems

Identifiers

PMID25561664
PMCPMC4290417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.